Friday, June 18, 2004
FAYETTEVILLE AND FT. BRAGG
TOMORROW Tomorrow morning I'll be pointing the Mooney
toward Fayetteville, North Carolina to spend a day with my affiliate WFNC
AM 640. Stops will include Ft.
Bragg to meet some of the men and women who are keeping our country
safe, a
lunch at the Sytex Conference Facility to
help raise some funds for the Stan "The Man" Harriman
Foundation with some WFNC listeners, and a tour of the Airborne &
Special Operations Museum. Think positively about the flying
weather folks, and I'll see you in Fayetteville tomorrow! |
HOW
MUCH MORE OBVIOUS CAN THE MEDIA BE?
Yesterday was not a good day for the national press corps. I can think of
few occasions where the bias was more obvious and pronounced. The story,
of course, was the release of some details of the 9/11 Commission report.
The report said that there was no credible evidence of any link between Saddam
Hussein and the organization of the 9/11 Islamic terrorist attacks on
America. It seemed as if the entire world of American journalism
immediately went into a feeding frenzy with stories telling us that Bush's
justification for the war, that Saddam was somehow connected with 9/11, had been
debunked. The trouble is, as I told you yesterday, Bush never made that
assertion! The Democratic co-chair of the 9/11 Commission, Lee Hamilton,
even said that there was no justification for the tact the press was taking
yesterday.
Well, Lee, you're wrong. There was a justification. In this
election, like none I've ever seen before, the press is determined to be a
factor. They are going to do everything they can to make every news story
that comes along look bad for Bush ... even to the point of distorting the story
itself. OK ... I know. This doesn't apply to every person in Washington or New
York making their living as a journalist. But you check out the stories
yesterday on CNN, ABC, CBS, The New York Times, The LA Times, the Washington
Post, Associated Press and more and you'll see what I'm talking about.
Every one of these media outlets said that the 9/11 report debunked Bush's
reason for ridding the world of Saddam ... even while the very chairman of the
commission was saying it just ain't so. FINALLY,
THOUGH, THE BUSH ADMINISTRATION IS FIGHTING BACK
Finally, for once, the Bush administration has grown a pair and is hitting back
over the media allegations that the 9/11 Commission has "discredited"
the president's assertion that there was a relationship between Saddam Hussein
and Al-Qaeda. There clearly was, but such is their desire to defeat
President Bush for re-election, the biased media is reporting otherwise.
Vice President Cheney said yesterday that the evidence was
"overwhelming" that Al-Qaeda had a relationship with Iraq. He
called the media reports that the 9/11 Commission report was contradictory
"irresponsible." He also said "There clearly was a
relationship. It's been testified to. The evidence is
overwhelming." Cheney then went on to say the contact goes back to
the 90's, and involved Osama Bin Laden and Iraqi intelligence officials.
Then, Cheney finally dropped the hammer. He said the press is "often
times lazy, often times just reports what somebody else in the press said
without doing their homework." Truer words have never been spoken,
except he could have added that the Bush-hating liberal media wants to do
everything it can to defeat his administration and elect The Poodle.
The Bush administration, including the president himself has said that there was
a relationship between Al-Qaeda and Iraq, because there was. What the 9/11
Commission is saying is the same thing the president has said, which is that
there is no evidence of a direct link between Iraq and the attacks of September
11th.
There was never a contradiction, nothing has been discredited and there is no
inconsistency, and the media knows it. At least this time, the
administration is hitting back.

DO
YOU WANT A SENSE OF WHAT A POODLE PRESIDENCY WOULD BE?
Well ... let's look at a Kerry campaign stop in Columbus, Ohio. The
Souffle was talking about education .. and about the large number of young
black men that were in jail. There are, you see, more young black males in
prison then there are in college. According to Kerry, "it's not their
fault." That's right. It's not these young black males fault
that they sold drugs, robbed, raped and murdered. It's our fault. We
... us adults. We did it to them, they didn't do it to themselves.
It's all because of poverty, poor schools, and no after school programs.
You've heard all this before. The normal and typical response of liberals
to the problem of crime. This is actually part of the leftist war against the individual. You
simply cannot hold individual black males responsible for their decision to
commit crimes. Society did it to them. Isn't it going to be just
grand when this apologist occupies the White House? | You do realize, don't you, that
American forces in Iraq haven't been looking for Saddam's weapons of
mass destruction for as long as Hillary Clinton looked for her
"missing" Rose Law Firm billing records. |
WE
REALLY HAVE FORGOTTEN, HAVEN'T WE?
I spent a good bit of time last evening watching the coverage of the 9/11
Commission's last public hearing. We heard tapes from the hijackers of the
four commercial airliners. We saw computerized depictions of the paths
these airliners took on their way to murder over 3,000 people. What we
didn't see, though, was pictures of the airplanes crashing into the World Trade
Towers. Our media is perfectly willing to show us video of the so-called
abuse at the Abu Ghraib prison over and over, but how long has it been since
you've seen those airplanes exploding through the towers? It seems that
Americans have forgotten the horror of that day. Well ... maybe that's
part of the plan. Remember the template. WHAT
IF THEY HAD BEEN SHOT DOWN??
So yesterday the 9/11 Commission played back the radio transmissions from the
9/11 hijackers. They were disturbing, with one of the hijackers, believed
to be Mohammed Atta, saying to passengers "Just stay quiet and you'll be
O.K." Of course, we all know what happened when that murderous
Islamic terrorist crashed that plane full of innocent people into the World
Trade Center.
Also presented was evidence that the government bureaucrats at the FAA then took
forever to contact the military, and eventually reached someone who asked if it
was a real emergency or an exercise. By the time the F-16's were
scrambled, it was too late. Later, the president, through Vice President
Dick Cheney, authorized shooting down planes that were headed for Washington,
but the orders never made it to the pilots. It's pretty sad when direct
orders from the President of the United States aren't carried out.
Anyway, all of this begs the question: What if they had been shot down?
What if the plane that crashed in Pennsylvania was shot down, the plane that
crashed into the Pentagon, the two planes that crashed into the World Trade
Center -- what if they had all been shot down, crashing harmlessly to the
ground. Can you imagine what would have happened?
Even though less that 300 lives would have been lost instead of almost
3,000, people would have been in an uproar. Democrats would have
been calling for President Bush's resignation the next day. The left would
be calling Dick Cheney a murderer, and the victim's families would be holding
press conferences. The media would align against the president, saying
that if only they had waited, maybe we could have talked to the
terrorists. Maybe we could have negotiated; found out why they were
angry. Surely they weren't going to crash those planes into
buildings. Impeachment proceedings would get underway.
An absurd idea? Maybe...but think about all of this in terms of September
10th. On September 11, the United States was not on a war footing, nobody
anywhere could envision what happened. All we can do is not let it happen
again
TERRORISTS
ARE NOT PRISONERS OF WAR
Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld said yesterday that he approved the secret
detention of a suspected terrorist in Iraq after receiving a request from the
CIA. The prisoner was hidden from the International Committee of the Red
Cross for seven months. The Geneva Conventions call for prompt
registration of the prisoner of war and access by the Red Cross. The left,
including The Poodle, is howling that we didn't designate this particular
suspected terrorist a prisoner of war.
There's only one problem with all of this: terrorists are not prisoners of war,
and thus are not entitled to the protections afforded to them by the Geneva
Conventions. Sure....we'll treat them humanely, give them food, water and
a place to sleep. But this is why they are called "enemy
combatants," and not prisoners of war.
To be entitled to prisoner of war status, the combatant must conduct operations
according to the laws and customs of war. For example, be part of a chain
of command, wear a uniform and bear arms openly. Terrorists and spies are
excluded. Those are the rules.
The United States could take terrorists out and shoot them and not be in
violation of the Geneva Conventions. So we hold certain Islamic terrorists
in a secret prison for a couple of months...who cares.
 READING ASSIGNMENTS
The
media is ignoring the most important findings from the 9/11 Commission.
Could it possibly be because those findings might actually help, rather than
hurt George Bush's reelection effort?
The Libertarian Party had a chance to make an impression on the media and the
American people with their convention, and they blew it. Let's
take this column straight to #1 on Townhall. Guess who's absolutely everywhere! Why, it's none other than Bill
Clinton! He's got the book. There's a new movie out! What
timing! All
of this happening when the focus should be on The Poodle.
Here's a rundown
of the links between Al-Qaeda, Saddam Hussein and Iraq, including some that
the 9/11 commission missed.
This is a story you're unlikely to read in the mainstream media: Israeli
Arabs are crediting the security fence with their newfound prosperity.
The 9/11 commission is getting it wrong again....and Richard
Miniter explains why.
Here's a transcript
of Vice President Cheney's exchange with Gloria Borger on CNBC about the Al-Qaeda-Iraq
connection.
The liberal media is at it again over the 9/11 commission's report...and
the Media Research Center is there.
Something has happened in the Middle East, but barely anyone has noticed.
The Palestinian intifada is over, and the Palestinians have lost. Charles
Krauthammer explains.
If the United States really wanted to invade a country for oil...how about
Canada? They're our biggest supplier, and it's surely easier to invade a
country with whose border is not defended. Rich
Tucker debunks the idea that countries are afraid of the United States.
What will happen if a nuclear bomb is detonated by a terrorist in the United
States? Paul
Greenberg has this prediction, in his 'dispatch from the future.'
How about, instead of the government spending billions of our tax dollars on
NASA, we instead unleash the private sector in space?
Jeff Jacoby explains.
Thomas Sowell looks at speech codes in schools around the country and asks:
who is silencing whom?
Rap video being filmed while inmate walked out of Fulton County Jail. |
You're Almost Done!
Select a display name and password
{* #socialRegistrationForm *} {* socialRegistration_displayName *} {* socialRegistration_emailAddress *} {* traditionalRegistration_password *} {* traditionalRegistration_passwordConfirm *}Tell us about yourself
{* registration_firstName *} {* registration_lastName *} {* registration_postalZip *} {* registration_birthday *} {* registration_gender *} {* agreeToTerms *}