The world-famous Internet site of the Nationally Syndicated Neal Boortz Show!
Hi, (not you?) | Member Center | Sign Out
Posted: 1:00 a.m. Wednesday, Sept. 22, 2004
By Neal Boortz
| Today's Nuze: September 22, 2004 | ||
![]() | ||
| Wednesday, September 22, 2004
John Kerry and his keepers are making a big deal out of the cool reception President Bush received at the United Nations yesterday. Even some members of the media are joining in. I listened to a CNN newscast where it was reported that Bush's speech was not interrupted once by applause, and that there was only polite applause at the finish. This is supposed to give you the idea that Bush's speech was in contrast with other foreign leaders who are apparently met with with multiple interruptions of raucous applause and a balloon drop at the end. Compare the approach of CNN with that of Fox News. Fox reported that the custom at the UN is that speeches are not to be interrupted with applause, and that applause at the end of the speech is to be merely polite. You are, however, allowed to hammer your shoe on the table if that floats your particular boat. This report by Brit Hume is, of course, further proof that Fox News is merely a sounding board for right wing kooks. But what about the speech itself? The speech was a home run .. the crowd just doesn't understand baseball. Bush's speech was filled with the kind of thing that the UN diplomats, dictatorships didn't want to hear. Bush talked of all sorts of crazy stuff about liberty, democracy, human rights, freedom and dignity. Those are the kinds of things that the United Nations is supposed to stand for, but clearly does not. Never really has. President Bush told the UN diplomats that "Both the American Declaration of Independence and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights proclaim the equal value and dignity of every human life. That dignity is honored by the rule of law, limits on the power of the state, respect for women, protection of private property, free speech, equal justice, and religious tolerance." Limits on the power of the state? Just how many of the people in that audience wanted to hear any nonsense on limiting the power of the state? And what's this about protection of private property? Doesn't Bush understand that all property really belongs to the state? Free speech? Religious tolerance? Who is this cowboy trying to kid? Do you know what these delegates really wanted to hear? They wanted the
type of speech that John Kerry would deliver. They wanted to hear of
appeasement. They wanted to hear that the United States was fully prepared
to cripple it's own manufacturing economy for the sake of strengthening the
economies of Euro-weenies and third-world dictators. They wanted to hear
that America would, from this point on, only send its troops overseas when the
United Nations approved. They wanted a speech ringing with the surrender
of American sovereignty. Elect The Poodle this year and they may get
exactly what they want next year ... but for now they deal with George
Bush. Just one idea to leave you with. Can you imagine what would happen if the United States announced that at some time certain it was going to withdraw from the United Nations and cease all further funding. At that time the United States would form a new international organization loosely modeled after the UN .. but with one huge difference. Only states who's leaders are popularly elected in open and free elections, and who place civilians in charge of the military, will be allowed to join.
You do know that Dan Rather still refuses to admit that the forged documents were forged ... don't you? Quoted in yesterday's Chicago Tribune Rather said that he still believes the documents to be real. The problem is that they can't authenticate them to the point that they should have been used on the air. How long is it going to be before Dan Rather starts hiding his own Easter Eggs?
The Poodle has decided that for the remaining weeks of the campaign he is going to concentrate on attacking George Bush's record in Iraq. That's pretty much it. Iraq and not much else. So, as soon as Bush finished talking to the ingrates and America-haters at the United Nations yesterday Kerry went on the offensive, saying that Bush had somehow squandered an opportunity. An opportunity to what? Grovel? Bush missed an opportunity to adopt a submissive pose in the presence of the great Kofi Annan? Bush missed a golden opportunity to apologize to the UN for actually putting some teeth in Security Council resolutions after 12 years of Saddam Hussein's antics? Kerry keeps telling the voters how he would have done things better. So, after all these weeks can any of you out there actually put Kerry's position on Iraq into one concise, easy to understand phrase or sentence? Kerry tried to do just that yesterday afternoon when he said: "The management of this war has been both arrogant, lacking in candor, and incompetent. I have one position. What I've always said is the world is better off without Saddam Hussein. The question is how you do it." Now that would indicate to me that Kerry approved of going to Iraq and deposing Saddam ... but that he just thinks Bush went about it all wrong. But on Monday night David Letterman asked Kerry "If you had been elected president in November of 2000, would we be in Iraq now?" Kerry's answer? "No." So that's Kerry's secret? You somehow rid the world of Saddam Hussein, but you don't go into Iraq. But then if you ask The Souffle if he regrets voting to give George Bush the right to go into Iraq and depose Saddam he says no! But wait! On November 9, 2002, on the floor of the U.S. Senate, Kerry said: "I think it would be naive at the point of grave danger not to believe that left to his own devices Saddam Hussein will provoke, misjudge, or stumble into a future more dangerous confrontation with the civilized world." Then on May 3, 2003, after the invasion of Iraq: "I think it was the right decision to disarm Saddam Hussein, and when the president made the decision I supported him, and I support the fact that we did disarm him." Then on December 16, 2003, after Saddam Hussein was captured, Kerry says "Those who believe today that we are not safer with his capture don't have the judgment to be president or the credibility to be elected president of the United States." Then yesterday we have Kerry saying that he doesn't even know if the invasion of Iraq was legal or illegal. How's that? He has all the answers, he knows just how the war should have been and should be fought, and he doesn't even have an opinion as to whether or not Bush's actions were legal? They ought to make a board game out of this stuff. Crystal clear, don't you think? It's always nice to know just where a candidate stands on the issues.
READING ASSIGNMENTS Townhall.com is continuing their pledge drive. Nobody works for free, and if you enjoy reading the articles on their excellent website, how about throwing a couple bucks their way. Here is the full transcript of President Bush's speech to the United Nations. The bad news gets worse for The Poodle....Bush now has an 11-point lead in Ohio. Hear that? It's the sound of the Democrats' chance of capturing the White House this year slipping away. California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger vetoed a bill that would have stopped five California high schools from using the nickname Redskins. Some bedwetter in the state legislator called it a racial slur. A rare win for common sense in government. This producer at CBS who was the source of the forged documents is a Bush-hating liberal. Expect her to be the first to go. The Kerry campaign is rejecting the idea that there was a link between them and the CBS story. There's only one problem with that: there was a link. Here's an e-mail from a Marine Major in Baghdad....who says the doom and gloom the media is reporting is not what he sees...and he is there on the ground. I think he would know, wouldn't he? Of course the media ignores this for one simple reason: it won't help elect John Kerry. The Poodle has taken yet another position on the Iraq war, and it's an issue he knows very little about. James S. Robbins breaks down The Souffle's new stance. Dan Rather claims he was misled by a source on the Bush National Guard documents story. Wrong, says John Podhoretz, who reminds Dan it is the other way around. Rather's apology on the CBS Evening News fell way short...he still hasn't apologized for impugning his critics and has not admitted the documents were forged. The Media Research Center has more. Has Election Day lost its significance? Apparently parents have less time to vote because they both think they have to work. Jeff Jacoby takes a look. Alan Greenspan and the Federal Reserve are actually doing something right for once. Larry Kudlow explains this whole business about interest rates. The Poodle supposedly has made his best speech on Iraq to date. But Jonah Goldberg says that's all well and good, but the Democrats still should have nominated somebody else. He suggests Weasley Clark. Read on. Professor Mike Adams takes his local newspaper to task for a lack of balance, and interestingly they are also a New York Times affiliate. Coincidence? I doubt it. Why do professional basketball players get paid millions of dollars a year while school teachers only make thousands? Walter E. Williams has a perfectly good explanation. Check out these amazing before and after photos showing the devastation Hurricane Ivan brought to the Gulf Coast. A grocery store in Washington state had to thoroughly clean its produce section after a man was accused of leaving human feces on the produce. EWWW! A anger management counselor was arrested for ordering his pitbulls to attack a group of people riding out Hurricane Ivan in their office building. Another example of how smoking kills. | ||
WHAT THE HECK ARE THOSE POINTY HAND THINGS? BOORTZ BLAST NEWSLETTER
NEAL'S FANS GET TOGETHER
Belinda Skelton, Ken Rogers, Laura Nunemaker and Brian Ganey assist in the daily preparation of Nealz Nuze! |
© 2013 Cox Media Group. By using this website,
you accept the terms of our Visitor Agreement and Privacy Policy, and understand your options regarding Ad Choices
.
Already have an account? Sign In
{* #registrationForm *} {* traditionalRegistration_displayName *} {* traditionalRegistration_emailAddress *} {* traditionalRegistration_password *} {* traditionalRegistration_passwordConfirm *}Already have an account? Sign In
{* #registrationFormBlank *} {* registration_firstName *} {* registration_lastName *} {* traditionalRegistration_displayName *} {* traditionalRegistration_emailAddressBlank *} {* registration_birthday *} {* registration_gender *} {* registration_postalZip *} {* traditionalRegistration_passwordBlank *} {* traditionalRegistration_passwordConfirmBlank *} {* agreeToTerms *}We have sent you a confirmation email. Please check your email and click on the link to activate your account.
We look forward to seeing you frequently. Visit us and sign in to update your profile, receive the latest news and keep up to date with mobile alerts.
Don't worry, it happens. We'll send you a link to create a new password.
{* #forgotPasswordForm *} {* forgotPassword_emailAddress *}We have sent you an email with a link to change your password.
We've sent an email with instructions to create a new password. Your existing password has not been changed.
To sign in you must verify your email address. Fill out the form below and we'll send you an email to verify.
{* #resendVerificationForm *} {* resendVerification_emailAddress *}Check your email for a link to verify your email address.


You're Almost Done!
Select a display name and password
{* #socialRegistrationForm *} {* socialRegistration_displayName *} {* socialRegistration_emailAddress *} {* traditionalRegistration_password *} {* traditionalRegistration_passwordConfirm *}Tell us about yourself
{* registration_firstName *} {* registration_lastName *} {* registration_postalZip *} {* registration_birthday *} {* registration_gender *} {* agreeToTerms *}