Tuesday -- April 12, 2005
YOU DO KNOW WHAT FRIDAY IS, DON'T YOU?
This Friday is April 15th. Unfortunately, it won't
just be another beautiful spring day. It's tax day. The day you must
file your federal income tax return. Many of you who are reading this have
not yet begun to fill your forms out. If you're like so many Americans,
you're dreading it. You're procrastinating. A survey conducted for
Associated Press shows that by a slight margin Americans would rather go to the
dentist rather than fill out their taxes. Seventy percent of
Americans say that their taxes are too complicated. Many of you will have
to write a check to the Imperial Federal Government. Go ahead, file an
extension. Nine million other taxpayers will. You still have to write the
check.
Several classes of people come to mind around this time of
year. First, we have those who pay no federal income taxes at
all. This is almost 50% of all income-earning Americans. It is no
mistake that so many Americans don't share in the responsibility of paying for
the operation of the federal government. It's been this way since the
beginning. They managed to get three-fourths of the states to ratify the
16th Amendment to our Constitution, the one allowing an income tax, by
convincing most of America that only wealthy individuals in a few Northeastern
states would have to pay the tax. Americans seem to find it so easy to
support taxes ... as long as other people are paying them.*
This might explain why so many Americans on the lower end of the earnings
scale aren't really worked up about tax reform. Secondly, we have those who not only don't pay taxes, they
actually get a check on April 15th. These are the Earned Income Tax Credit
freeloaders. Their so-called tax "credit" exceeds the amount of taxes they
owe, so the government just writes them a check for the amount of the unused
"credit." Washington likes to call this a "refundable credit."
People who speak plain English call it a welfare check, a handout, or outright
thievery. For the life of me I can't see how an honest American can sit
there and take a check for the balance of their unused tax credit, knowing that
money came out of their neighbor's wallet, and not feel guilty as hell.
Then we have the great American wage earners who have no
clue as to how much they paid in federal income taxes this year. They just
know they're getting a refund. That's it. If you walk up to one of
these myrmidons right after they've finished filling out their 1040 and ask them
how much they had to pay in taxes this year, their mouths will open and they
will promptly utter that one phrase that makes thrills the political mind; that
one phrase that is an aural tattoo of abject stupidity: "I didn't have to
pay anything. I'm getting some back." These are the people who used
to ride the short bus to school and who are now anxiously waiting for that magic
day when their rent-to-own furniture will finally be all theirs. They will
celebrate by tearing off those little "do not remove under penalty of law"
labels. These people are truly the poster children for government schools. Then there's that small group of Americans who know the
score; who know how much they earned and how much they paid in taxes. They
also know that they're resented, even hated, by the rest. Amazing, isn't
it? Americans who pay no federal income taxes, Americans who are
essentially getting a free ride ... these Americans actually resent the people
who are paying their way ... resent them because they are more successful,
because they make more money. I digress. Back to our final group of
taxpayers, the top 50% of income earners who pay about 96% of all income taxes.
The top 1% of income earners, those who earn about 18% of all income, but who
pay 38% of all federal income taxes. These are the people who drive our
economy through their creative abilities. They're the ones who invest in
old businesses and begin new ones. They are called "boss" by about 80% of
U.S. workers, and they're being rode hard and put up wet by our current tax
system. It doesn't have to be this way. We can fund the operations of the federal government
without punishing achievement. We can fund the government without creating
and sustaining class envy. We can fund the government without putting
American businesses at a competitive disadvantage with much of the rest of the
world. We can fund the government while allowing American workers to
receive 100% of their paychecks each and every payday, and allowing them to
become savers and investors. It's called
The FairTax .. .and the book is coming to a book store near you soon. *Case
in point. The wage cap on Social Security right now is $90,000.
After that your wages aren't subject to the Social Security tax. A lot
of people who make much less than $90,000 a year seem to think that it would
be a real nifty idea to raise that wage cap to, say, $200,000 a year to
"save" Social Security. They would much rather see other people pay
more taxes than to actually take on some of the responsibility for investing
their own retirement funds in a private account.
THE GAP BETWEEN RICH AND POOR
I notice quite a few news stories lately about all of the
wonderful politicians out there who want to dedicate their efforts to "reducing
the widening gap between the rich and the poor." Spare me.
Most of the politicians want to address this problem by taking from the rich and
giving to the poor. Well, since there are more people who consider
themselves poor than rich, that would sure work at the ballot box. The
answer here is to address the gap between "will work hard" and "won't work
hard"; the gap between achievement and non-achievement; the gap between "paid
attention in school" and "didn't pay attention in school"; the gap between good
choices and bad choices. Poverty is a behavioral disorder .. a mental
disease. You don't cure poverty by punishing the sane. JESSE JACKSON HAS FOUND HIS NEXT PHOTO OP
Now that Terri Schiavo has passed away, Jesse has been
looking for more camera time. Well ... look no further. He's found
it, right here in Georgia. He's working with Georgia's Black Legislative
Caucus to mount a fight against a new soon-to-be law in Georgia that would
(gasp!) require people to prove they are who they say they are before they pick
up their ballots on election day. Oh, the humanity! GO FIGURE
For decades the United Nations has been critical of the
United States. Not only critical, but downright antagonistic. Now
President Bush has appointed a U.N. Ambassador who has been critical of the
United Nations. Democrats don't like it. So ... a quick review.
The United Nations slams the United States and Democrats remain silent. A
U.S. diplomat criticizes the United Nations and Democrats go nuts. Would
someone please explain this to me? ABSOLUTELY AT EASE WITH MY POSITION
Referring here to Terri Schiavo. After all of the
"I'm never going to listen to you again" emails from the emotional cowards out
there, and after it has become abundantly clear that what we witnessed in
Pinellas Park, Florida was nothing more than an obscene media circus where
members of the media outnumbered protesters. After the jugglers, the woman
in the tutu, and the rantings against federal judges. After coming to
understand just how ignorant so many politicians, not to mention their
constituents, are as to the concept of a rule of law vs. a rule of man ... after
all of this, I just wanted to tell you how happy I am that I was on the right
side of this mess all along. May Terri Schiavo finally rest in peace.
THE
MEDIA'S POLITICAL AGENDA
Anyone that is being
remotely honest with themselves can see that the mainstream media is an
absolutely liberal institution. From polls that show the majority of reporters
always vote for Democrats to studies of their broadcasts...the evidence is
overwhelming. The left can protest the idea all it wants ... but the leftist
bias in our mainstream media is patently obvious and overwhelming. One need
look no further than how the Bush-hating left covers this administration. But
now we have an interesting tidbit, courtesy of Robert Novak, that takes the
media bias to a new level: outright political propaganda.
The media is out for
blood....and their latest target is House Majority Leader Tom DeLay. The Texas
Republican is being accused of ethical lapses. Some of what he did looks
questionable, but is within the law and perhaps most importantly, is done by
politicians of both parties all the time. No matter...the left wants him out.
Democrats need a target...they need a hook if they're to have any hope of
winning back the House next year. Since they've been mad at DeLay for his role
in Congressional redistricting, he's become a convenient target.
Many have called for him
to step aside, including a few spineless "Republicans." With DeLay in the
headlines, the New York Times set out to find some more Republicans to call for
his ouster. They wanted somebody to write an op-ed piece. A couple weeks ago
someone from the Times sent former Louisiana Congressman Bob Livingston an
e-mail asking if he would write such a piece. When informed that it would be
supportive of DeLay, they took a pass. In other words, if it didn't support
their political agenda, they had no interest in what he had to say.
If you remember,
Livingston was set to become Speaker of the House when Newt Gingrich stepped
down in 1998. He resigned when a sexual affair he was having became public and
the job eventually fell to Dennis Hastert. At any rate, Livingston didn't wind up
writing anything for the New York Times. Perhaps their slogan, 'All The News
That's Fit To Print' now means that only Bush-hating, leftist, liberal
propaganda is fit to print.
Forget media bias,
folks. They've started just manufacturing the news.
JOHN KERRY OUTS CIA AGENT
Remember all of the
outrage and liberal indignation awhile ago when former ambassador Joseph
Wilson's wife Valerie Plame was outed as a CIA agent? Evidently it was an
unnamed Bush administration official that supplied the name....and the results
of that investigation have yet to be made public. Well, it's happened again.
Guess who publicly outed a CIA agent this time?
Massachusetts Senator
John Kerry. That's right...The Poodle's faux pas came yesterday as he was
slamming U.N. Ambassador-nominee John Bolton at his confirmation hearings.
Here's how it went down. For the majority of the hearings, Bolton and the
Senators on the committee had been referring to a former employee of Bolton's
anonymously, calling him "Mr. Smith." Kerry was questioning Bolton about
whether or not his actions toward this person were legitimate, or were
politically motivated. Then the Souffle, reading from transcripts of
closed-door meetings, says:
"Did Otto Reich share his
belief that Fulton Armstrong should be removed from his position? The answer is
yes."
Oops...Fulton Armstrong
was the anonymous "Mr. Smith," which is how Bolton referred to him in his reply
to Kerry. Now, to be fair, Kerry was not the only member of the committee to
use Armstrong's name in the hearings. But just stop and ask yourself
something. Fulton Armstrong is/was an intelligence analyst, just like Valerie
Plame apparently was.
Democrats acted like it
was an act of treason when someone blew Plame's cover, even though it was
supposedly an open secret around Washington. Now Kerry obviously made a
mistake. I'll give him that. But will Democrats and the media treat
Kerry's slip-up the same way they treated the Valerie Plame affair?
What? Are you nuts?
Of course not!
THE TORT KING RESURFACES
We haven't heard too much
from John Edwards since he rode off into the sunset following his Vice
Presidential defeat last November. He didn't run for re-election for his Senate
seat in North Carolina, so he slithered back into the private sector after
cleaning out his desk. But now the Tort King has resurfaced.
It turns out the
blow-dried ambulance chaser has been more than a little miffed about all this
talk about The Hildabeast being a lock for the 2008 Democratic nomination.
Edwards still wants the job, and apparently has every intention of running for
president again. In an interview, he said "I think talking about a front-runner
four years before an election is ridiculous."
I don't think Edwards
would find it so ridiculous if the media had anointed him.
He was also asked about
the recently passed tort reform bill and somehow turned it into a referendum on
himself: "People have attacked my career ever since I've been involved in
politics. But the attacks never stick. I think people fundamentally believe that
those who have been wronged by powerful interests should be able to hold them
accountable." Yes, but the tort reform that was passed really had nothing to do
with individual personal injury cases (his specialty.) It was about curbing the
ridiculous amount of class action lawsuits that are filed through jurisdiction
shopping in state courts.
By the way, he did say
one thing that was right, when asked about the Terri Schiavo matter: "They will
pay a price for this in the 2006 and 2008 elections." True...but will Democrats
put John Edwards on the ticket ahead of Hillary Clinton? No way.
Rainbow Bridge
Just this side of heaven is a place called Rainbow Bridge.
When an animal dies that has been especially close to someone here, that pet goes to Rainbow Bridge. There are meadows and hills for all of our special friends so they can run and play together. There is plenty of food, water and sunshine, and our friends are warm and comfortable.
All the animals who had been ill and old are restored to health and vigor; those who were hurt or maimed are made whole and strong again, just as we remember them in our dreams of days and times gone by. The animals are happy and content, except for one small thing; they each miss someone very special to them, who had to be left behind.
They all run and play together, but the day comes when one suddenly stops and looks into the distance. His bright eyes are intent; His eager body quivers. Suddenly he begins to run from the group, flying over the green grass, his legs carrying him faster and faster.
You have been spotted, and when you and your special friend finally meet, you cling together in joyous reunion, never to be parted again. The happy kisses rain upon your face; your hands again caress the beloved head, and you look once more into the trusting eyes of your pet, so long gone from your life but never absent from your heart.
Then you cross Rainbow Bridge together....
Author unknown... |
READING ASSIGNMENTS
Robert Novak exposes the New York Times' efforts
to shop around for an op-ed calling for Tom DeLay's removal. This one goes
beyond bias.
'60 Minutes'
Andy Rooney caused a ruckus while testifying at a fraud trial
yesterday, and had to be admonished by the judge. The reason? Rooney took
exception to the oath, which included "So help you God."
Be still my heart....400
airport screeners at Hartsfield -Jackson might get the boot
by the end of September. Naturally, officials are "worried." Worried about
what? It's not like the TSA screeners served any actual worthwhile purpose
anyway.
With all of the focus on
the border with Mexico...here's a little statistic for you.
Did you know that there are 50 border crossings between the United States and
Canada that are unmanned?
Did you also know that Canadian immigration laws are much more lax than ours
are?
So who is to blame for
high gas prices? It isn't the oil companies.....as has been pointed out many
times before,
Brian Simpson says you need look no further
than your friendly neighborhood environmentalist to lay blame.
When Fahrenheit 9/11 came
out, Michael Moore was telling anyone that would listen that his movie was
popular all across the country, and that it would derail the Bush
administration.
Byron York has some insider information on what that didn't happen.
Another study has been
released showing the overwhelming leftist bias of college professors in the
United States.
Cathy Young says no one should be surprised at the statistics.
With all of the attention
being paid to the judicial branch following the Schiavo case,
Thomas Sowell asks whether or not
judges should be above criticism.
With so much good news
coming out of Iraq, naturally you would expect the liberal media to not be
covering any of it.
David Limbaugh says the media is still following the anti-Bush template.
With the passing of Pope
John Paul II, there was a lot of focus on his message over the years about
helping the poor. But was John Paul a socialist?
Star Parker takes a look at his writings. Morning Sickness: Teen in jail after
removing the head from a corpse. |