The world-famous Internet site of the Nationally Syndicated Neal Boortz Show!
Hi, (not you?) | Member Center | Sign Out
Posted: 1:00 a.m. Tuesday, Aug. 2, 2005
By Neal Boortz
| Today's Nuze: August 02, 2005 | ||
![]() | ||
| Tuesday -- August 2, 2005
John Linder and I worked hard to make
The FairTax Book entertaining and easy to
read. Actually, we didn't have to work ALL that hard. The FairTax is easy to
understand, so our real task was to make a book on tax reform entertaining. I
think we did it. Much to the consternation of Teddy Kennedy and George Voinovich,
George Bush
appointed John Bolton to be the ambassador to the UN yesterday. This is provided
for by the Constitution...the president can appoint someone during a
Congressional recess, and that person can serve until the next Congress takes
office in January 2007. So Bolton it is. So why do Democrats have their panties in a bunch over Bolton's appointment? It has nothing to do with the reasons they've given. Stories about abusing subordinates and manipulating intelligence aren't why the left opposes Bolton. Rather, it's because Bolton is not an internationalist UN-worshiper. He believes the United States is a sovereign nation and the world's only superpower. This irritates leftists like Kofi Annan and Teddy Kennedy. They believe the United Nations should be the world's only superpower, with taxing authority and military control over its member nations. The next 19 months will be interesting down at UN...hopefully with Bolton swinging the bat we can reform that rat hole. To listen to the media and the Democrats, you would think that a recess appointment was a rare abuse of power. It would be easy to infer that such an outrage hadn't taken place in what...100 years? Nope...quite the contrary. Let's go to the tape. Using the four most recent presidents, here are the numbers of recess appointments made: --President George W. Bush: 110 recess appointments in 4 1/2 years in office. --President Bill Clinton: 140 recess appointments in two terms. --President Bush Senior: 77 recess appointments in his one term. --President Ronald Reagan: 240 recess appointments in two terms. So let's see...according to the calculator, that's 567 recess appointments in the last 25 years, or an average of just over 22 a year. Bush had the power to put Bolton in the ambassador chair and he did it. Other presidents, both Democrat and Republican, have done the same thing. It's nothing new. Ike even used the recess appointment to put 3 Justices on the Supreme Court. Can you imagine the squeals of the Democrats today if Bush did the same thing? A positively outstanding quote out of London today. That city continues to be on
lockdown while the police search for Islamic terrorists and try to stop any
further terrorist bombings. This involves going into the subway (or the
Underground, as it's known over there) and searching people. Don't want to be
searched? Too bad. Welcome to the year 2005. Now hand over the bag. But there are millions of people in London. How will the police decide to spend their limited resources? Unless they suddenly develop an overnight ratio of one bobby per citizen, they have to be selective. If this were the United States, they would pursue the deadly, idiotic and politically correct procedure of not-so-random security checks. They would be told to search every 10th or 20th person, no matter who they were. Little old lady, old man in a wheelchair...no matter. The TSA would do their duty! But in Great Britain, they're setting aside political correctness and doing what needs to be done. It's called racial profiling. That means searching people who fit the physical description of a terrorist: people of Middle Eastern descent. Check out the following quote from a story in the London Evening Standard: British Transport Police Chief Constable Ian Johnston said that his officers would not "waste time searching old white ladies." Amen. Now if we could just get that through the thick skulls of the politicians running things in Washington, we'd all be just a little bit safer.
Vein-ly Induced Life Stem cell research began back in the sixties, since then it has never 'cured' any disease. Canadian scientists Ernest McCullock and James Till, trained in hematology and biophysics, discovered that stem cells help to regenerate damaged tissues and organs. Together they discovered that if they injected mice with bone marrow cells that a nodule that was produced in their spleen came about as a direct reaction to the marrow growing a stem cell, or that which was proportionate to the amount injected. These men moved on to researching cures for cancer specific to leukemia and variations of it. Chemotherapy treatment for cancer will kill off the stem cells needed to help produce the red and white blood cells. The debate over stem cells is not that the study should stop, but a debate over the sources for the extraction. There are three types of stem cells, but I am choosing to focus on the source of them and how the life is affected by their removal with adult and embryonic stem cells. Adult cells can come from bone marrow, cadavers and umbilical cords. Embryonic stem cells come from fertilized human eggs at a stage where they consist of 50-150 cells. Adult stem cells do not hinder growth if removed, whereas embryonic stem cells will kill the embryo that it is being taken from. Since there is debate over when life actually begins, I am convinced that a seed from a tree is also alive the second it starts to grow within its seed coat. Cord blood has been extracted since 1988, from umbilical cords. Even though it is from a newborn baby, the cells are matured and called adult stem cells. These are being used in treatment of Gunther's disease, hinter syndrome, Hurler syndrome, acute lymphocytic leukemia and many other problems with children. In 2004, South Korea credited them with helping a woman with a spinal injury to walk again, but I only found a couple one-sided sources to verify this. These stem cells can be extracted from a living person as well as a dead one. Studies have shown the highest concentration of matured stem cells come from cadavers. Other studies have used stem cells extracted from umbilical cords. Like blood, we each have our own variety; like DNA, common cells between people are rare unless from the same blood line. Therefore the cells from your own umbilical cord are a direct match for your own stem cells. It's too bad that we have not been saving umbilical cord blood for more than 17 years. If you are reading this, we can assume that your parents did not have the option to save yours, however now you can request it be saved for your own children, at a substantial cost. In 2001, President Bush assigned around 30 million tax payer dollars to embryonic specific stem cell research. Our hard earned money was being used by the government to purchase and dissect fertilized eggs (blastocyst) from fertility clinics that no longer need to store them. Three years later Bush ended the funding when he realized that it wasn't a lack of funding or availability that prevented finding a use for stem cells, rather the fact that they were useless in curing any potentially fatal disease. This did not, nor does it currently, restrict private funding if someone feels the need to donate or contribute to it. Limits are pushed on issues everyday and eventually things that were taboo will be commonplace. In my own (and vastly supported) ideas, once we allow any type of embryonic stem cell research, they will have to wait for more and more mature embryos. In fact, they will one day be so mature that there will be no denying on any side whether or not it was an aborted fetus. Of course, that is assuming they aren't already being bought for adult stem cell research. Allowing federal funding means that one day we will be paying abortion clinics for the later and later developed fetuses. This will make the abortion taboo less of a reason to avoid it as long as the baby is used for science. It would be a 'gift' of life, rather than an abortion, right? No one should be able shirk responsibility and have the easy out of scientific use. And don't write to me about the people who are victims of rape and incest, they only make up less than 1% of abortions. Neither side is going to change their stance on abortion. You either feel strongly on one side or the other. Sometimes arguing with someone about the value of life is like "trying to teach a pig to sing....it's a waste of your time and it annoys the pig." My biggest problem is those people who support this are trying to make me pay for it. In 1997 Clinton banned cloning in saying that "any effort in humans to transfer a somatic cell nucleus into an enucleatered egg involves the creation of an embryo, with the apparent potential to be implanted in utero and developed to term." About eight months after Bush came into office he put a ban on 'future' stem cell research, being stem cell sources that came about after his policy came into effect. Then in 2004, President Bush signed a law into place that prevents tax payer's mandatory support of such studies . But Proposition 71, passed this last November in California, went against the federal law that Bush had signed now stating that California tax payers money would contribute to 3 billion dollars over the next 10 years, not to mention the interest on that which nearly doubles it. Yes, you Californians get to pay for something you may not support while the rest of us don't. Thank a rino. Stem cell research has recently come back into the spot light since another politician has apparently become a flip-flopper, meet Sen. Bill Frist. Just before the elections he was debating with Sen. John Edwards against Edwards' support of embryonic research claiming false hope. All of the sudden "it isn't just a matter of faith, it's a matter of science." Make up your mind Senator. Didn't you learn anything from Kerry's flip flopping loss? I am a self-proclaimed 'movie narcoleptic:' likely to fall asleep during any and all movies. So it was quite a feat that I actually made it to one yesterday, but for matters of relevance, I decided I had to do it. If you are Conservative and want to see a great movie, with time sensitive themes... you'll wonder how on earth this one managed to sneak out of Hollyweird... go see this movie! The Island is about a man who realizes that science and the gift of life from man, is likely not Utopic at all. Finally, a movie that will make you uncomfortable for all the Right reasons. REDNECK SCRAP BOOK Redneck cats are tough. They don't need no stinkin' carpet on their furniture. The Redneck Scrap Book goes on... ATLANTA AREA FAIR TAX RALLY THIS FRIDAY Atlanta and Georgia listeners! We
want you at the "Fair Tax Rally" and Pre-Rally Luncheon this Friday at the Cobb
County Civic Center in Marietta, Georgia. Here's the schedule: READING ASSIGNMENTS Morning Sickness: Man's pneumonia caused by his lost dentures found in his bronchial tubes. Heather's reading assignments Straight from the "Oh.My.Word.Files." Trees drink water too. How they may be depleting our sources. Who gets a pay raise like this? We vote them in, can we not vote for their pay? Wednesday morning NASA is going to send an astronaut to remove protrusions by cutting them off or gently tugging on them until they come out. I'm not quite sure what a 'stinkhorn' is, but it was so retched that they thought it might be a corpse. Even the French hate French fries . Well, you all made up your own rules to GoogleWhacking , this game may be more of a challenge: GoogleSmacking. This is NOT a contest; please do NOT submit your results. Thanks! J Returning for his stash on the side of the road near the court house, the police left him a post-it note. His mom says, "I know my son has done some bad things, but I did not train him to be this dumb ." | ||
WHAT THE HECK ARE THOSE POINTY HAND THINGS? BOORTZ BLAST NEWSLETTER
NEAL'S FANS GET TOGETHER
Belinda Skelton, Ken Rogers, Laura Nunemaker and Brian Ganey assist in the daily preparation of Nealz Nuze! |
© 2013 Cox Media Group. By using this website,
you accept the terms of our Visitor Agreement and Privacy Policy, and understand your options regarding Ad Choices
.
Already have an account? Sign In
{* #registrationForm *} {* traditionalRegistration_displayName *} {* traditionalRegistration_emailAddress *} {* traditionalRegistration_password *} {* traditionalRegistration_passwordConfirm *}Already have an account? Sign In
{* #registrationFormBlank *} {* registration_firstName *} {* registration_lastName *} {* traditionalRegistration_displayName *} {* traditionalRegistration_emailAddressBlank *} {* registration_birthday *} {* registration_gender *} {* registration_postalZip *} {* traditionalRegistration_passwordBlank *} {* traditionalRegistration_passwordConfirmBlank *} {* agreeToTerms *}We have sent you a confirmation email. Please check your email and click on the link to activate your account.
We look forward to seeing you frequently. Visit us and sign in to update your profile, receive the latest news and keep up to date with mobile alerts.
Don't worry, it happens. We'll send you a link to create a new password.
{* #forgotPasswordForm *} {* forgotPassword_emailAddress *}We have sent you an email with a link to change your password.
We've sent an email with instructions to create a new password. Your existing password has not been changed.
To sign in you must verify your email address. Fill out the form below and we'll send you an email to verify.
{* #resendVerificationForm *} {* resendVerification_emailAddress *}Check your email for a link to verify your email address.


You're Almost Done!
Select a display name and password
{* #socialRegistrationForm *} {* socialRegistration_displayName *} {* socialRegistration_emailAddress *} {* traditionalRegistration_password *} {* traditionalRegistration_passwordConfirm *}Tell us about yourself
{* registration_firstName *} {* registration_lastName *} {* registration_postalZip *} {* registration_birthday *} {* registration_gender *} {* agreeToTerms *}