January 4, 2005
A TURNING POINT FOR ALL THE WORLD?
Uh oh. Here it comes. The Independent Online Edition features an
article today titled "Could the tsunami disaster be a turning point for the
world?" The lead paragraph reads: "As the international
aid effort grows and George Bush launches a fresh appeal, we ask politicians and
commentators if 2005 might see a new determination to tackle global
poverty." So, there you go. A massive earthquake and the resulting tidal waves
are somehow being translated into an urgent need to address the problem of world
poverty. We all saw this one coming. Let's take a look at what some excerpts from what these "politicians and
commentators" had to say about the issue: - I am hopeful, but we must see a real commitment to changing the economic
relationships between the West and the poorer countries. As well as
charitable giving,
- On an individual level, it is not just about what we are prepared to give,
but what we are prepared to give up. Having left Afghanistan and Iraq in
their wake, can our leaders be trusted to fight a war on poverty? (This from
a comedian)
- No longer can we exist in isolation when we see lives and livelihoods
being destroyed.
- It seems churlish to say it, but while it's relatively easy for most of us
to give 50, it would be much harder for us to make the changes in our
modern lifestyles that are needed if we are to move to a fairer world.
(A "fairer world?" Fine .. .define "fair."
This comment, by the way, from a Greenpeace honcho.)
- It was the same after 11 September. Everyone said it was a great
opportunity to try to understand the world but it was used by the US as a
reason to go on a rampaging adventure in Afghanistan and Iraq. (Another
comedian heard from. Somehow the Independent thinks that comedians are
a great source for comments on how to change the world.)
- Western capitalism demands that people must be impoverished. (This
comment from an artist. Imagine my surprise.)
- The danger is that resources which might have gone to Africa will go to
this instead. (Can't shortchange Africa, can we? Here is a
continent with absolutely immense natural resources, and they can't even
feed themselves.)
- It would be one of the biggest breakthroughs mankind has ever experienced
if we pooled our wealth in order to look after the poorer people of the
world. (A Novelist)
- It may make people realize that the UN needs to be well-equipped and
funded. If people diverted money from weapons and war, we have the
technology and money to be able to help - if we decide to do that. (The
UN? Talk about diverting money. Has this former cabinet minister
heard of the Oil-for-Food scandal?)
Now ... what's missing from these comments? One word.
Freedom. The greatest mechanism for ending poverty the world has ever seen
is capitalism and the free enterprise system, yet we see no comments from any of
these exalted commentators and politicians relating to ending third world
tyranny and bring the wonders of economic freedom to bear in a worldwide war on
poverty. Let me tell you where this is going. Read those comments again and
you'll see references to "giving" and "giving up." You see
condemnations, not praise for capitalism. These people are obviously
focused on the idea of taking the current worldwide economic pie re-slicing it
so that everybody gets a peace. Nobody is talking about simply baking a
bigger pie. The anti-West, anti-capitalistic left is going to use this tsunami as a
platform to promote not a rise in worldwide economic freedom, but for an
increase in worldwide wealth redistribution. The United States, as the
richest nation in the world, is going to be cast as the villain, while poor
third world countries will be presented to us as the victims. One other thing. In this quest to combat world poverty nobody is going
to state the obvious: That we have too many women in poor countries around
the world having children that they simply cannot afford to raise. Step
one in avoiding poverty ... birth control. Don't have children you can't
afford. But why bring that up when it's just so much easier to attack the
west and demand that their ill-gotten gains simply be seized and redistributed. WHAT COMES AROUND GOES AROUND
Well, what a difference a week makes. After the initial charge that the United
States of America was being stingy with its response to the tsunami disaster,
the glare of scrutiny has been focused elsewhere: Arab countries.
First up, Kuwait. Kuwait has pledged $10 million, up from an earlier pledge of
$2 million. Some are pointing out that's not much, when you consider how wealthy
that country is. The price of oil has roughly doubled, and Kuwait now has a $10
billion budget surplus. They've got the cash. So how's come the figure is so
low? More on that in a minute.
Other wealthy Muslim countries have contributed as follows: Qatar - $10 million,
Saudi Arabia - $10 million and The United Arab Emirates, $20 million. So what's
the problem? Well, there really isn't one, since money apparently isn't the
problem right now anyway.
What's interesting to note here is that these wealthy Muslim countries are not
jumping at the change to help their fellow worshipers of Islam. Indonesia, the
most affected country, is the most populous Muslim nation. Yet, countries with
enormous sums of money aren't really putting their money where their mouth is
when it comes to helping their people.
Some believe that the earthquake and tsunami were the work of Allah, punishing
Thailand, for example, for prostitution. These Muslim nations sure
can whine about the way Muslims are treated around the world, but when it comes
time for them to step forward and show how much they really care, they're out to
lunch somewhere.
That's okay, though....as always, the United States, who has freed more Muslims
from tyranny than any other power, will be there to pick up the slack.
TERRORISTS GETTING MORE DESPERATE
As elections draw nearer in Iraq, the Islamic terrorists that do not want to see
freedom and liberty spread to the Middle East are turning up the heat in Iraq.
The latest attack is the assassination of the Governor of the Baghdad Province.
Gunmen attacked his motorcade this morning, killing him and six of his
bodyguards.
Some want to give into these goons and delay elections, which is exactly what
they want. They do not want to see the people of Iraq freely choosing leaders
and they especially do not want to see women voting in those elections. They
would rather see the institution of a strict Islamic dictatorship, and they're
willing to kill to get it.
Expect the call to delay the January 30th elections to grow louder. Expect more
attacks. The Islamic terrorists and the Islamic world in general does not want
to see democracy succeed in Iraq, at any cost.
CUTTING SOCIAL SECURITY
As soon as President Bush is sworn in for his second term, the battle for Social
Security reform is going to be underway. This is going to be the most vicious,
partisan battle ever waged. This will make welfare reform look like a bike ride.
The president has proposed allowing younger workers to put a percentage of their
social security taxes into a private investment account. In doing so, they will
enjoy a much higher rate of return than those who throw their money down a rat
hole. By taking the money out of the system to fund the private accounts, that
leaves a hole of a couple trillion dollars...if the system is not changed.
That's the money to be paid to older beneficiaries that would have come from the
money that will go to private accounts. So where is the administration going to
get it?
There are three ways to get the difference: raise taxes, borrow the money or cut
benefits. The president has ruled out raising taxes already, and there's not
much desire to borrow any more money, considering the size of the deficit and
the national debt. So that means cutting benefits.
A report out today says the administration is leaning toward cutting the rate of
growth in Social Security. This will be accomplished by adjusting the cost of
living not based on wage inflation, but regular inflation. In other words,
retirees would still get the promised benefits, but the increases would be based
on inflation, not the yearly rise in wages. As you can imagine, the AARP, which
is committed to the bankrupting of America's youth to line the pockets of the
Gimme Generation, is none too happy.
It's going to be quite a battle.
READING ASSIGNMENTS
U.S.
jets have buzzed Iranian airspace, apparently to test their defenses just to
see what would happen. Gotta have a look at those nuclear sites, in case we
should decide to bomb them.
Kofi Annan is
already concerned that nations pledging money for the tsunami disaster won't
cough up the bucks. His corrupt buddies at the U.N. should have plenty of
cash, after Saddam loaded up their pockets with stolen oil-for-food money.
With all the talk about global warming,
let's talk about global cooling. December had some of the coldest
temperatures recorded since 1945. This should get the environmentalists all
worked up.
Is flying safe? You bet...the
airlines have only had 34 deaths in 3 years. During that same time, 120,000
people have died in car accidents. Yet, for some reason, there is no "fear
of driving."
The war on drugs has lasted for decades with untold billions of dollars as the
price tag for the quagmire. Syndicated columnist Neal Peirce says legalizing
street drugs just might be an experiment worth considering.
So
what is the game plan for the Democrats to take back the House, the Senate and
the White House? Walter Shapiro says they most definitely won't get it done
by whining.
A study coming out in the Stanford Law Review this month asserts that affirmative
action produces fewer, rather than more black lawyers. Star Parker takes a
look at the controversy.
Liberals have been bashing President Bush over his supposed inaction over the
tsunami disaster. David Limbaugh says the
left are the ones exploiting the tragedy.
In today's column, Professor Mike
Adams writes a letter to a student who is requesting special treatment over
missed classes. Adams proposes an interesting solution.
With Social Security reform about to be on the front burner, Rich Tucker says
it's time to face the facts: beginning in 2018,
there's nothing in the trust fund but IOU's.

See the t-shirt the man is
wearing as he watches a strecher being carried by? This is probably a tsunami
victim who will be screaming for more aid from America as the tragedy unfolds.
|
You're Almost Done!
Select a display name and password
{* #socialRegistrationForm *} {* socialRegistration_displayName *} {* socialRegistration_emailAddress *} {* traditionalRegistration_password *} {* traditionalRegistration_passwordConfirm *}Tell us about yourself
{* registration_firstName *} {* registration_lastName *} {* registration_postalZip *} {* registration_birthday *} {* registration_gender *} {* agreeToTerms *}