January 5, 2005
THERE
IS NO PROPOSAL TO CUT SOCIAL SECURITY BENEFITS
First of all ... let's get this question settled at the beginning. The
AARP is running full-page ads in major American newspapers today saying that
George Bush intends to cut Social Security benefits. The AARP is engaging
in its usual tactic of trying to frighten the Depends right off of our wizened
class by making them believe that their Social Security checks are going to get
smaller if George Bush gets his way. That's a lie. It is not true.
There is no proposal on the table, nor will any proposal be made that would
reduce the Social Security benefits to any retired person or anyone nearing
retirement. The AARP knows this, but they continue with their ad campaign
nonetheless. Now ... here's the basic outline of what Bush is expected to propose:
* Allow younger workers to invest around 4% of their Social Security taxes into
a personal account with a maximum of between $1,000 and $1,300 a year
* Cover the "cost" of the accounts by slowing the growth of payouts to
future beneficiaries
Sounds like a win-win situation, right? Younger workers get to actually invest
some of their money in a retirement account instead of throwing it down a rat
hole and it's all done without any real cuts in benefits in terms of current
dollars. The only difference is the increases won't be as generous. Let's try to explain it a bit better. Here's a paragraph from a story
appearing in yesterday's Washington Post: "Currently, initial benefits are set by a complex formula that
calculates workers' average annual earnings in their 35 highest-paid years and
adjusts those earnings up from those years to reflect standards of living near
the worker's retirement age. That adjustment is based on wage growth
over that time span. Under the commission plan, the adjustment would be
based instead on the rise in consumer prices."
Indexing the Social Security benefits to the increases in workers' wages
instead of the rate of inflation was a political ploy from the get-go.
Politicians were in love with the idea of finding any way they could to increase
the promised benefits to Social Security benefits. There was no better way
to bring the votes flowing in then to promise the voter money ... and more
money. N. Gregory Mankiw is the chairman of the 2001 Commission to
Strengthen Social Security. Mankiw says that the current system of
"wage indexing" of Social Security benefits is the primary culprit for
Social Security's present problems. Bottom line ... it has to go. In
the process Democrats are going to do everything they can to make sure that
Republicans are hurt politically. Now .. here's the kicker. It doesn't really matter that some
politicians cooked up an irresponsible plan for indexing Social Security
benefits years ago. It doesn't really matter what future retirees are
promised by that system. It doesn't matter because there is no way it's
going to happen. That formula is dead. Democrats know it. The AARP
knows it. Proceeding under that formula will guarantee financial collapse
for Social Security ... unless, that is, some other drastic measure is
adopted. And here we're talking about increasing the retirement age, or a
massive increase in Social Security taxes. Are you listening? The Social Security system simply cannot pay the
benefits that have been promised. It's time to pay the piper.
Hundreds of politicians have benefited from playing the increased benefits game
over the past six decades, and now the bill is due. George Bush is the
first president who actually has the canons to tackle this difficult and
emotional problem. As he works for a solution Democrats and the AARP are
going to sit on the sidelines and take cheap and dishonest shots.
Democrats for votes, the AARP for increased membership and donations. AGAIN
... PLEASE KEEP YOUR DONATIONS AWAY FROM THE UNITED NATIONS
I just wanted to drop a reminder here. As the tsunami tragedy continues
to unfold Americans are showing their compassion and generosity as contributions
continue to pour in to various agencies. Again, might I suggest that you do not
donate any money through any agency of the United Nations. Three reasons: 1. The United Nations is corrupt. Please remember the billions of
dollars siphoned away from the women and children of Iraq by corrupt UN
officials. What have you seen lately to make you believe things have
improved? 2. The United Nations is basically anti-American. It is and it
always has been. Why work hard and then donate your money to the victims
of the tsunami only to have that money distributed in the name of the United
Nations rather than the name of your country? 3. There are plenty of American charitable organizations who do
perfectly wonderful things with your donations. These include AmeriCares
and The
American Red Cross. That's where my money went. The United Nations is the enemy of American sovereignty. It makes no
sense to enable your enemies and make them stronger. Wonder how much of your donation is going to charity and how much is going to
administrative costs? Check out your favorite charity at give.org. FROM
TODAY'S "VENT"
You know you are getting old when "getting lucky" means you find
your car in the parking lot. GONZALES
TORTURE STARTS TOMORROW
The
hearings for Attorney General nominee Alberto Gonzales get underway, and the
Democrats are already preparing the noose. Aside from the fact that they hate
George Bush, their complaint seems to be this business about whether or not
Judge Gonzales had anything to do with the administration's change in policy
over Islamic terrorists.
They're demanding memos be released, and the White House isn't budging. Why
should they? The Democrats have a 44-seat minority in the Senate, and can be
ignored. So what's their problem with these memos?
They don't like the idea that the administration correctly ruled that the Geneva
Conventions do not apply to captured terrorists. That has been the long-standing
policy of the United States for years, and hasn't changed. Islamic terrorists
that are not part of an organized army or recognized state can be treated like
spies, which means we can torture them, execute them, and do whatever we want.
He'll probably be confirmed, but this one is going to be a spectacle.
HELP
MUSLIM TIES? DREAM ON
Secretary of State Colin Powell is touring the Banda Aceh region in Indonesia
along with Florida Governor Jeb Bush. Powell said of the American aid pouring
into Indonesia: "America is not an anti-Islam, an anti-Muslim nation.
America is a diverse society. We respect all religions." The good secretary
intimated that perhaps our gesture would help improve ties to the Muslim world.
Fat chance. I'm not holding my breath.
The only thing that the United States can do to earn the respect and even
affection of the Muslim world would be to liberate the millions of Muslims who
live under the theocratic dictatorships of their religious leaders. We're
working on it, and getting damned little support along the way.
READING ASSIGNMENTS
And now, a
salute to the sailors of the U.S.S. Abraham Lincoln. Did you know that the
sailors aboard that aircraft carrier have stopped taking showers so that every
drop of water can be used for tsunami victims? Michelle Malkin salutes the
heroes of our armed forces.
Clayton County, Georgia has a problem. Apparently the people of Clayton
County have elected a Sheriff who might be a bigot, and who certainly has
delusions of grandeur. His name is Victor Hill and he fired 27 of his
employees on his first day in office, so he could replace them with his own. He
also fired the highest-ranking white officers, saying their replacements will be
black. Can you imagine if the situation were reversed? We'll see if he gets
away with it.
Is
the United States a republic or a democracy? I've had more than a few
people accuse me of being a Nazi, and worse, because for over 30 years I've been
telling people that we are NOT a Democracy. Now I have some support
from the brilliant Walter E. Williams. He settles the debate once and for all.
The situation in the Washington governor's race shows the new Democratic
strategy for winning elections in 2000 and beyond: if you can't win it,
steal it. David Johnson has more.
It's
time to give the soldiers serving in Iraq their glory. John Podhoretz
explains that not only do the troops support the mission, but they intend to win
the war.
Even though it's their standard reaction, Mark Steyn says it's hard to pin the
tsunami on America. However, they will find a way...after all, everything
bad that happens in the world is the fault of the United States of America.
The allegations against Alberto Gonzales are some of the flimsiest ever, and
should not prevent his nomination. Senator
John Cornyn has a point-by-point rebuttal of all the Democrats' complaints about
Gonzales.
President Bush is trying to conduct things in a bi-partisan manner, and Linda
Chavez reminds us that naturally, the
Democrats will not be reciprocating. First up: the nomination of Alberto
Gonzales to be Attorney General.
So
is the United Nations good or bad? Jonah Goldberg debates the point, and
explains that it is possible to be in favor of some of the UN's missions,
without being in favor of it taking American sovereignty with it.
The charity Doctors Without Borders has now committed a cardinal sin: they've
told the world to stop sending money because they don't need anymore. Jay Bryant
says other
charities are hopping mad.
At least two - maybe more - Supreme Court justices are going to retire in the
next couple years. Armstrong Williams takes a
look at the changing face of the court, now that George W. Bush will be
nominating the replacements.
|