The world-famous Internet site of the Nationally Syndicated Neal Boortz Show!
Hi, (not you?) | Member Center | Sign Out
Posted: 1:00 a.m. Wednesday, March 2, 2005
By Neal Boortz
| Today's Nuze: March 02, 2005 | ||
![]() | ||
| Wednesday -- March 2, 2005
Yesterday we had a ruling from the Supreme Court in the case of Christopher Simmons [pdf]. You see, in 1993, Simmons was 17 and decided, along with his 15-year-old buddy, to kidnap Shirley Crook in her St. Louis home. Simmons and his pal must not have liked Shirley Crook too much, for they tied her up, threw her into a minivan and drove to a bridge over a river. There they covered her face in duct tape and threw her over the railing and into the water. She drowned. Christopher Simmons later bragged to his friends that they could get away with it because they were minors. Sadly, because of this ruling, they will get away with it. The Supreme Court has now ruled that a person cannot be executed for a crime committed when that person was less than 18 years old. Cruel and unusual punishment, says the court. The opinion was written by liberal justice Anthony Kennedy ... and this ruling sends ice water through the veins of anyone who understands our Constitution and the role of our Supreme Court. The Supreme Court, you see, is expected to cite a Constitutional basis for its rulings. Not so in this case. Instead, Kennedy cites a "national consensus" and "international opinion." Boiled down, "national consensus" is just another way of saying "the will of the majority." So now it seems official. The Supreme Court will base its rulings on what is and what is not Constitutional based on the mood of the people; based on the whims of the mob. This is nothing less than the legitimization of the lynch mob. If there's a "national consensus" that old so-and-so must hang, then hang he does, regardless of whether or not such niceties as the rule of law have been followed or Constitutional rights met. Perhaps the next step is for the Supremes to hire a polling firm to measure the mood of the people before they issue rulings on Constitutionality. The reference to "international opinion." Maybe some guidance from the Supremes is needed at this point. At what point does international opinion trump the dictates and limitations of our Constitution? Should the "international opinion" standard be used by the Supreme Court to decide whether or not a president's foreign policy initiatives are legal? Maybe Ted Kennedy and John Kerry should have tried to get a Supreme Court ruling on the legality of Bush's actions in Iraq. Using the "international opinion" standard Bush's actions would almost certainly have been found to be unconstitutional. Sadly, most of this will go unnoticed by the dumb masses. The vast majority of Americans will direct their attention to the current NASCAR standings, tonight's edition of Entertainment Tonight and whether or not there's enough brewski in the 'fridge for the weekend.
President Bush made it the centerpiece of his second term agenda during his
State of the Union address this year: reforming Social Security. This is the
program that is already broken (government securities do not a trust fund make)
and will officially go bust some years down the road. So Bush wants to fix it. In the meantime, one Republican is actually proposing yet another government spending program as the solution. Florida Republican Clay Shaw, the Chairman of the House Social Security subcommittee, wants some sort of a government subsidized savings plans outside Social Security. I haven't heard the details, but I would imagine that if you set aside some money the government will match that money. And just where does the matching money come from? From the taxpayers, of course. Here's a guarantee: If Clay Shaw actually gets his government handout program started there's going to be an outcry about the poor, poor, pitiful poor people who just can't afford to get started in the saving program, and thus aren't eligible for the matching government funds. You know how that one will end up, don't you? The government will end up paying both the personal and the government share. And you wonder why I'm a libertarian?
We have a new teen fad ... if you want to call it that ... in Orlando. It's "garage jumping." Teenagers are jumping between parking garages in downtown Orlando ... jumping six stories high. One local idiot didn't make it. Tim Bargfrede fell six stories and was knocked out cold. Apparently several other teens have fallen and been injured in attempting the jump. One of the garages is owned by the City of Orlando. The other is owned by Orlando Tower LP. Well .. guess what? Yeah, you got it. Bargfrede's father is going to file some lawsuits. He's suing the city and Orlando Tower because they failed to put up fences that could keep teenagers from trying to jump from one parking garage to the other. The father's attorney says that what fence there is is completely ineffective in preventing the jumping. The family says that both garage owners need to take responsibility before someone dies. Well, they're right about someone needing to take responsibility ... but it's the families and the kids, not the owners of the garages, who need to step up. There is just no way in hell the garage owners ought to be held responsible. These teens are old enough to understand the consequences of a fall. Another reason why we need a loser-pays legal system.
Here's a bit of email that Net Dog forwarded to me from Michael J.
Well ... to be sure, that's not exactly hate mail. Maybe the next one will make up for it.
That means it took me a month to come to the realization that Joseph C. Poore, Jr. needs to switch to decaf. Here's the message he sent to me on January 31st of this year:
Slander! Treason! Loathsome bombast! And this character doesn't realize that there were and there still are many --- not a few, but MANY Bush-hating Democrats who find themselves increasingly depressed with every breath of freedom that emanates from the Middle East? These Democrats are now near suicidal after elections are announced in Egypt, women get the vote in Saudi Arabia, Iranian Mullahs are running for cover and the Syrian puppet government in Lebanon fails.
And now we know her name. She's Gwen Stewart. She works at some business somewhere on Power's Ferry Road in Atlanta, and she's still going ape about some cops eating bananas. I told you this story about a few weeks ago. It first appeared in an article by Tim Chitwood in the Columbus Ledger Enquirer. Stewart was participating in an MLK Day ceremony in Columbus, Georgia. As her bus arrived at the demonstration site she saw a cop eating a banana. She complained. Evidently there was something racially insulting about that cop sitting there eating that banana. The banana, by the way, came from a police snack cart that is sent around to police who have to spend hours on the street protecting people like Gwen Stewart while she's demonstrating. Bananas are a good source of potassium and energy. Nonetheless, Stewart doesn't like them. Well, so what's new? Now it seems that Stewart has complained to her Congressman! Congressman Tom Price has contacted the Columbus police chief asking for a response to Stewart's complaint. Price also wants copies of any correspondence concerning the banana controversy. By the way, Stewart refuses to say just why she is so upset about the banana. Stewart tells Chitwood that she shouldn't have to explain why she was insulted by the cop eating the banana. She says that people ought to know why that's offensive, and if they don't know then they should just go find out. The problem here is that Gwen Stewart has a monstrous racial chip on her shoulder, and Congressman Tom Price price needs to stop wasting his time on this hysteric and tell her to go home, crawl in bed and pull the covers up over her head. Then again, if she has white sheets she might find that suggestion offensive. What a miserable woman Gwen Stewart must be.
READING ASSIGNMENTS Here's the Tuesday CyberAlert from the Media Research Center, the 1,923rd edition of same. Nobody -- nowhere -- does a better job of documenting the leftist media bias in the mainstream media then does the MRC. Big oops. Gun control activist Annette Stevens is now facing charges of having both drugs and a gun in her home. The gun had the serial number filed off. The Supreme Court continues with its liberal social activism. A Wall Street Journal editorial. Here is some interesting insight into the eminent domain case Kelo vs. City of New London, heard before the Supreme Court last week. Howard
Dean is at it again...this time calling Republicans "evil."
Conservatives are outraged, but they should be smiling. It's only a matter of
time before he starts screaming. Just wait. Thoughts of Boortz Blast subscribers on abortion and last week's episode of House. Apparently, Joe still hasn't learned that it's polite to give credit when copying the Nuze and posting to another site. Maybe it's time to call him out on it again. | ||
WHAT THE HECK ARE THOSE POINTY HAND THINGS? BOORTZ BLAST NEWSLETTER
NEAL'S FANS GET TOGETHER
Belinda Skelton, Ken Rogers, Laura Nunemaker and Brian Ganey assist in the daily preparation of Nealz Nuze! |
© 2013 Cox Media Group. By using this website,
you accept the terms of our Visitor Agreement and Privacy Policy, and understand your options regarding Ad Choices
.
Already have an account? Sign In
{* #registrationForm *} {* traditionalRegistration_displayName *} {* traditionalRegistration_emailAddress *} {* traditionalRegistration_password *} {* traditionalRegistration_passwordConfirm *}Already have an account? Sign In
{* #registrationFormBlank *} {* registration_firstName *} {* registration_lastName *} {* traditionalRegistration_displayName *} {* traditionalRegistration_emailAddressBlank *} {* registration_birthday *} {* registration_gender *} {* registration_postalZip *} {* traditionalRegistration_passwordBlank *} {* traditionalRegistration_passwordConfirmBlank *} {* agreeToTerms *}We have sent you a confirmation email. Please check your email and click on the link to activate your account.
We look forward to seeing you frequently. Visit us and sign in to update your profile, receive the latest news and keep up to date with mobile alerts.
Don't worry, it happens. We'll send you a link to create a new password.
{* #forgotPasswordForm *} {* forgotPassword_emailAddress *}We have sent you an email with a link to change your password.
We've sent an email with instructions to create a new password. Your existing password has not been changed.
To sign in you must verify your email address. Fill out the form below and we'll send you an email to verify.
{* #resendVerificationForm *} {* resendVerification_emailAddress *}Check your email for a link to verify your email address.


You're Almost Done!
Select a display name and password
{* #socialRegistrationForm *} {* socialRegistration_displayName *} {* socialRegistration_emailAddress *} {* traditionalRegistration_password *} {* traditionalRegistration_passwordConfirm *}Tell us about yourself
{* registration_firstName *} {* registration_lastName *} {* registration_postalZip *} {* registration_birthday *} {* registration_gender *} {* agreeToTerms *}