The world-famous Internet site of the Nationally Syndicated Neal Boortz Show!
Hi, (not you?) | Member Center | Sign Out
Posted: 1:00 a.m. Monday, March 7, 2005
By Neal Boortz
| Today's Nuze: March 07, 2005 | |||
![]() | |||
Monday -- March 7, 2005
Let's talk about this ransom business for a bit. The United States refuses to pay for the release of hostages. Italy has a history of doing so. We refuse to pay because it rewards the hostage-takers and encourages yet more kidnappings. It can be said that Italy's actions in paying for the release of Sgrena served to increase the level of danger for every other westerner in Iraq. Time, I guess, will tell. The point here is that there are reasons to be upset with their side too. U.S. forces say that Sgrena's car approached a checkpoint on the Baghdad airport road without slowing, and the driver ignored repeated warnings to stop. The warnings reportedly included arm signals, bright flashing white lights, shots fired in front of the car and a shot into the engine block. One more thing. The U.S. Military says that they weren't warned in advance about the release of Sgrena and that she would be driven to the airport after that release. Why wasn't the U.S. told? Evidently the Italians were afraid that we might try to dissuade them from paying the ransom and might actually interfere in some way. So ... first mistake; not telling the U.S. Military that you are going to be making a run for the airport with a freed hostage. Sgrena's story? She says there were no warnings, no bright lights. She says that they weren't even at a checkpoint. A U.S. tank just pulled along side and started firing. She also says they weren't speeding. Riigggghhhhhtttttt. A car full of Italians, and they weren't speeding? Dogs and cats sleeping together. What you probably won't hear today as this story gets played over and over and over. Giuliana Sgrena wrote for a newspaper called "Il Manifesto." As you might suspect from the name, it's one of Italy's communist newspapers. Now hold on a second. I'm not saying that Sgrena got what she deserved because she writes for a communist newspaper. I am saying that it would be illogical to expect either Sgrena or the newspaper she writes for to be at all sympathetic to the situation faced by our forces in Baghdad. Both Sgrena and her newspaper were adamantly opposed to the war in Iraq. Il Manifesto is already accusing U.S. Forces of assassinating the secret service agent, and her partner (whatever that means) says that the shooting was intentional. He referred to the U.S. troops as "imbeciles or terrorized kids who shoot at anyone." The funeral this morning for Calipari is going to be a focal point for expressions of hatred toward the U.S. and U.S. policy in Iraq. It will be a rallying point for those who long for the days of Saddam Hussein. If you're a news junkie you'll hear condemnation and criticism of the U.S. forces time after time throughout the day. It will be interesting if you see one single story about Sgrena's connection with a communist newspaper and their adamant opposition to what the U.S. has accomplished in Iraq. Why, you ask, is that important? It's important because this is a newspaper with strong anti-American credentials. It's not right to report the criticism heaped on the U.S. from a newspaper without identifying that newspaper's strongly anti-U.S. bias. So ... who is telling the truth? Maybe we'll never really know. One thing for sure, the incident certainly presents a great opportunity for someone predisposed to dislike America, and someone who has already expressed her adamant opposition to what U.S. troops have accomplished in Iraq, to rally international opinion against the United States. Of one thing you can be sure. The next time there is some controversy surrounding a reporter from some right wing newspaper you can rest assured that the affiliation will be highlighted in virtually every news story. The unwritten rules demand that right wingers always be identified as such, while leftists are treated as the norm. Ted Kennedy wants to raise it to $7.25 an hour, in three increments over 26 months. Republican Rick Santorum wants to raise it $1.10 over 18 months, in two increments of 55 cents. The Republicans want to add it to the bankruptcy legislation, which the Democrats oppose. Because of the threat of filibuster, they'll need 60 votes to pass either one, which is unlikely. In the debate over the minimum wage, we will hear people time and time again say that it is impossible to raise a family on the minimum wage. Well ... duhhhhh! Of course you can't raise a family on the minimum wage! This is a wage that is usually paid to teenagers who are bringing the bare minimum of job skills to their very first job. Beyond that .... losers. Oh yeah, it's insensitive ... and you might even find it offensive. That would be your problem. Face facts. The minimum wage is for losers. Baring some physical or mental disaster ... anyone living in this country who has not managed to acquire enough education and job skills to earn more than the minimum wage is a complete failure ... a loser. These are not the kinds of people who should be having children. Not only can't you raise a family on minimum wage, you shouldn't even be trying to. If our child welfare agencies were really doing their job they would be classifying every child in a household where their parent or guardian can't earn more than the minimum wage as endangered ... and promptly remove them. This is not a role for government. There is nothing in the Constitution
which permits the Imperial Federal Government to involve itself in a contract
between an employer and employee. The salary or hourly wage should be
agreed upon between the two parties and not subject to government
approval. The minimum wage should be abolished, not raised. People should
take their job skills and work ethic into the marketplace and compete with
everyone else. If the bid for your services isn't high enough, maybe
that's a broad hint that your services aren't valuable enough. Time to
improve. The marketplace should decide what someone should be paid, not
the government.
All of a sudden it would seem the Arab dictators in the Middle East are singing
a different tune these days. Could it be because they have seen the United
States liberate two enslaved peoples in Iraq and Afghanistan, bringing about
free elections? Just as was the case with the fall of the Berlin wall and the
collapse of the Soviet Union, once people have a taste of freedom, it can't be
stopped. It's contagious. READING ASSIGNMENTS I've already told you why Hillary Clinton is so hyped about the idea of letting felons vote. You didn't believe me, so maybe you'll believe believe The Wall Street Journal's John Fund. Here is a translation
of the report Giuliana Sgrena filed for the Italian communist newspaper she
works for. Interesting that she admits she knew the area near the airport was
heavily patrolled by American troops. An avalanche awareness class gets caught ... in a ... well,
you can just guess. | |||
WHAT THE HECK ARE THOSE POINTY HAND THINGS? BOORTZ BLAST NEWSLETTER
NEAL'S FANS GET TOGETHER
Belinda Skelton, Ken Rogers, Laura Nunemaker and Brian Ganey assist in the daily preparation of Nealz Nuze! |
© 2013 Cox Media Group. By using this website,
you accept the terms of our Visitor Agreement and Privacy Policy, and understand your options regarding Ad Choices
.
Already have an account? Sign In
{* #registrationForm *} {* traditionalRegistration_displayName *} {* traditionalRegistration_emailAddress *} {* traditionalRegistration_password *} {* traditionalRegistration_passwordConfirm *}Already have an account? Sign In
{* #registrationFormBlank *} {* registration_firstName *} {* registration_lastName *} {* traditionalRegistration_displayName *} {* traditionalRegistration_emailAddressBlank *} {* registration_birthday *} {* registration_gender *} {* registration_postalZip *} {* traditionalRegistration_passwordBlank *} {* traditionalRegistration_passwordConfirmBlank *} {* agreeToTerms *}We have sent you a confirmation email. Please check your email and click on the link to activate your account.
We look forward to seeing you frequently. Visit us and sign in to update your profile, receive the latest news and keep up to date with mobile alerts.
Don't worry, it happens. We'll send you a link to create a new password.
{* #forgotPasswordForm *} {* forgotPassword_emailAddress *}We have sent you an email with a link to change your password.
We've sent an email with instructions to create a new password. Your existing password has not been changed.
To sign in you must verify your email address. Fill out the form below and we'll send you an email to verify.
{* #resendVerificationForm *} {* resendVerification_emailAddress *}Check your email for a link to verify your email address.


You're Almost Done!
Select a display name and password
{* #socialRegistrationForm *} {* socialRegistration_displayName *} {* socialRegistration_emailAddress *} {* traditionalRegistration_password *} {* traditionalRegistration_passwordConfirm *}Tell us about yourself
{* registration_firstName *} {* registration_lastName *} {* registration_postalZip *} {* registration_birthday *} {* registration_gender *} {* agreeToTerms *}