The world-famous Internet site of the Nationally Syndicated Neal Boortz Show!
Hi, (not you?) | Member Center | Sign Out
Posted: 1:00 a.m. Wednesday, March 30, 2005
By Neal Boortz
| Today's Nuze: March 30, 2005 | ||
![]() | ||
| Wednesday -- March 30, 2005
Race warlords in Georgia are screaming. They are mightily upset. "Governor Perdue, don't sign this bill!!!!" Oh the humanity. This hideous and horrible bill is being cast by race pimps as "a disaster for race relations in the State of Georgia." One black legislator said that this new bill was "spitting on the grave of Martin Luther King, Jr." This bill is so bad that black lawmakers staged a walkout when the measure was debated earlier this month. They said that it could turn back the clock on civil rights. "It's an attack on the rights of minorities." So, what's going on? Well, it seems that both the Georgia House and Senate have passed bills requiring all voters to show some kind of picture ID before they can cast a vote. [HB 244 | SB 84] Any one of six different types of picture ID will do. A driver's license will work, even if it is expired. The law provides for free state-issued picture IDs for anyone who wants one. Still, the race pimps aren't satisfied. You know what's going on here, don't you? Voter fraud is a reality, and across this country most of the votes that are illegally cast are cast for Democrats. It is Democrats who are driving the demands that non-citizens be allowed to vote in local elections. It is Democrats who are even insisting that illegal aliens be permitted to vote in some areas. It is Democrats who have opposed each and every move, no matter where, to attempt to clean up the election process by making sure that people who vote are actually legally qualified to vote. It is Democrats who want felons to vote! They know that felons will, by and large, vote for Democrats. I'll say it again. Most illegally cast votes are cast for Democrats. Democrats have been at the forefront of every move to loosen voting restrictions and to counter any attempt to combat voter fraud. Now .. if you really want to hear Democrats howl ... make it easier for military personnel to vote. Military personnel, you see, usually vote Republican.
President Bush's ratings are at a new low. That really is a shame. The news coming out of Iraq is very positive right now. The Iraqis are just about to seat their first popularly elected government in about fifteen camel generations. The news in Afghanistan is also good, and the idea of freedom and allowing people to participate in the selection of those who will rule them is gaining traction virtually throughout the Middle East. So ... Bush is trying to bolster his falling approval ratings by sending Laura to Afghanistan and by touting his successes in Iraq. May I make some suggestions here? May I suggest that the principal reason for the precipitous drop in Bush's popularity ratings might be due to the fact that Americans .. not all, but many ... are just a little bit upset that Bush so eagerly injected the federal government into what should be a private family matter? Right now we have the staffs of two United States Senators, Harkin, a Democrat from Iowa, and Martinez, a Republican from Florida, working to put together a law that would require federal court review of any family dispute about a patient without a living will. Why a federal court review? Why can't this be handled in the state courts? Why do we have to expand the scope and power of the Imperial Federal Government to the point that the tentacles of government reach into the very heart of intra-family relations? What can the federal courts do here that the state courts cannot? Estate matters, wills and such, have always been adjudicated by local courts. What is the role of the federal government here?
We all know the answer here, don't we .. and the answer points us to one of the principle reasons for the decline in Bush's approval ratings. There is one reason that the Congress got involved in this unpleasantness in Florida. One reason that Bush rushed back to Washington to sign legislation injecting the federal government into that situation, and one reason Harkin and Martinez are working on their legislation to expand the powers of the federal government. That reason is pressure from anti-abortion advocates and religious extremists. Definition needed. Just how do you define a religious extremist? I define a religious extremist as anyone who wants to use the power of law -- and that means deadly force -- to force their religious principals on someone else. Someone who openly calls for a theocracy in America, as Randall Terry has done, is an extremist. Randall Terry is at the center of the Florida controversy. Bush's actions were seen by some as pandering to Randall Terry. These Florida hospice protestors who wandered down the street about 10 days ago to harass an auto shop owner for daring to work on a Sunday would be examples of religious extremists. Bush's actions were seen as pandering to these zealots. This frightens people. Many Americans become a little concerned when they see their president going out of the way to meet the demands of people who openly call for a theocracy and who hammer someone who is working on Sunday to make ends meet while raising his two sons alone. Now ... I can assure you that what I have written thus far here in Nealz Nuze will bring more hate mail with more of those childish "I'm never going to listen to you again" closes. To many it is absolutely forbidden to say anything that can be construed as negative about anyone who expresses a strong Christian belief. To do so means that you don't love Jesus. If you say that you don't want to live under Randall Terry's idea of a Christian theocracy, you don't love Jesus. If you say that a man working hard to support his family shouldn't be harassed because he works on Sunday, you don't love Jesus. If you say that while you admire the religious devotion shown by some devout Christians, but that you don't want them telling you how to live your life, you don't love Jesus. If George Bush wants to calm people down, and send his approval ratings back up again, perhaps he could assure the Americans that he believes that America is not going to become a theocracy under his watch, and that the rule of law does, and will continue to hold sway over the wishes of those who want to order the lives of others along strictly defined religious lines. But the, that would mean that he doesn't love Jesus.
Kofi held a press conference pretending that the report exonerated him of any
wrongdoing. When asked if he would be stepping down, he said "Hell
no." As the noose tightens and there are more investigations and more
reports, how long before Kofi throws in the towel? TRAMP STAMP SHOWDOWN The discussion this week turned to back tattoos. Neal and Royal each have their own opinion of them. Do you know of a back tattoo you think is sexy? Maybe we can use it.
READING ASSIGNMENTS The Minuteman Project is a case of an all-volunteer group of citizens exercising their Constitutional rights of freedom of speech, freedom of assembly and freedom to petition the government for redress of grievances. Michelle Malkin (sigh) says it's outrageous that the ACLU is opposed to their activities. The entire Terri Schiavo saga is a sickening display of cynicism and fanaticism, says Cathy Young. She explains that while people opposed to Schiavo's death mean well, there just isn't a Terri Schiavo left to save. Moammar Khadafi recently lectured a meeting of the Arab League...with hilarious results. Amir Taheri dissects what it all means, including the reactions from other Arab leaders. Townhall.com's fund drive is going well, and Star Parker thanks everyone who has contributed so far. If you enjoy the columns on the site, feel free to throw a few bucks their way. Should Congress pass legislation just because it's a good idea? Walter Williams has an example of a good idea, but should Congress make it the law of the land? Thought-provoking, and not to be missed. The media has decided that they will talk to anyone about anything, making them a celebrity and an authority on whatever the subject at hand is. Kathleen Parker talks about the child molester who has become an on-air pundit. What college has the craziest feminists? Professor Mike Adams says it's not UNC-Wilmington, where he teaches, but rather another school. Read his column to find out which one and why. The celebrity gossip business isn't doing too well in the old media these days. Tony Blankley says it's because the Internet is taking over, but he reminds people that not everything you read online is even remotely true. Does the Terri Schiavo case spell the end of the road for conservatism? A number of columnists and journalists think so, but Jonah Goldberg says not so fast. Some countries choose to conduct their monetary policy by pegging the value of their currency to the U.S. Dollar...for example, China. Jack Kemp says this is a good idea, and explains why. An interesting explanation of monetary policy that won't make your head hurt. Too much. Police officer suspended for nearly keeping doctor for delivering baby. | ||
WHAT THE HECK ARE THOSE POINTY HAND THINGS? BOORTZ BLAST NEWSLETTER
NEAL'S FANS GET TOGETHER
Belinda Skelton, Ken Rogers, Laura Nunemaker and Brian Ganey assist in the daily preparation of Nealz Nuze! |