The world-famous Internet site of the Nationally Syndicated Neal Boortz Show!
Hi, (not you?) | Member Center | Sign Out
Posted: 1:00 a.m. Monday, May 2, 2005
By Neal Boortz
| Today's Nuze: May 02, 2005 | |||
![]() | |||
| Monday -- May 2, 2005
Such a big wedding! Oh my! Let's face it. These two had been living together for five years. When you've been living together for five years you should just go out there, get your license, and have a nice quiet little ceremony somewhere. Huge weddings are fine, but aren't they really for couples who are just starting their lives together? Jennifer and John Mason weren't starting anything. They were merely legitimizing what they began years ago. Eight bridal showers? Twenty-eight bridesmaids and groomsmen? Six hundred guests? A bit much, don't you think? But maybe the big wedding wasn't her idea! Many, many years ago I had a relative commit suicide over an unwilling participation in a huge wedding. Is it possible that Jennifer Wilbanks ran away for the same reason? Was this huge wedding her idea, or was it something that was more or less forced on her by her parents? I don't know if we'll ever know the answer to this one, but is it possible that Jennifer wanted a quieter wedding, but was being compelled to participate in something that she felt was getting completely out of control? Sometimes you wonder just who these weddings are for .. the bride and groom, or the parents? Just a thought. Maybe five years was enough! Now John Mason seems like a perfectly nice guy to me, but I wasn't the one who was going to marry him last Saturday. Again, we don't know ... but maybe Jennifer just decided that five years was enough, and ran. But this much seems certain ... Now maybe Jennifer Wilbanks is profoundly mentally disturbed. Maybe, but not likely. The truth is more likely that Jennifer is a completely self-absorbed, narcissistic brat who thinks somehow that it really is all about her. What an incredibly self-centered thing she did. Certainly she must have known of the fear that would have gripped the very souls of her fiancee and her parents if she went running and just didn't return. Come on, folks ... she's not a child. Did she really think that she would be able to just get on a bus and head out of town without creating some sort of a panic back at home? And just what was it that cause her to end her little running game and call home? Homesick? No. Remorse? Evidently not. It wasn't out of concern over the situation she had created back home in Duluth, Georgia. The poor little runaway bride just ran out of money. Where does this go from here? Well, a lot of people want her charged with some sort of a crime. Fine, I can understand that. But what crime? Now I never practiced criminal law .. but the only crime I can think of is that she made a false report to the Albuquerque police. She said she had been abducted. Once she got to the police station it didn't take long for experienced interrogators to get to the bottom of her story, and the whole abduction nonsense was dead. The Albuquerque police have said she won't be charged. Can she be charged in Georgia for a false report to the Albuquerque police? That would be a first. But wait! Maybe we have this going for us. In a phone call to Duluth Police Chief Randy Belcher poor little Jennifer also said that she had been abducted ... abducted from Duluth! So there we have her making a false report of a crime to Duluth police! Now there's something you can hang a charge on! Go for it, Danny Porter! It wasn't a crime for her to buy that bus ticket ahead of time, as is reported. It wasn't a crime for her to get on that bus. It wasn't a crime for her not to tell her fiance or her parents and friends where she was going. It wasn't a crime for her not to call home. Other than the false report to the cops, I can't see anything that she did that was illegal. Well ... maybe fraud. If she did intentionally deceive people .. and if people were deceived by her actions to their detriment ... well, maybe so. In fact, maybe fraud could be the basis for a lawsuit brought by the city of Duluth and the State of Georgia. There were thousands of man-hours spent by the Duluth police, the Georgia State patrol, the FBI and other law enforcement agencies. Someone ought to try to recoup those dollars .. as unlikely as that would be. How many victims of actual, real crimes could have been helped with the money spent looking for Jennifer? How many actual crimes might have been prevented if law enforcement hadn't been so busy looking for the runaway bride? And what about the caterers? Do you think they got paid? Hope so. Maybe they have a cause of action. And then there's this story that she pre-arranged transportation to the bus station in Duluth. Pre-arranged? With who? Certainly the person who took her to the bus station knew of the tremendous upheaval she caused back in Duluth. Perhaps here is someone else who needs to be charged with a crime. Is covering up an attempted fraud a crime? I just love the statement Jennifer's family came out with on Saturday. They said: "We're so proud Jennifer is alive and well. It has been determined Jennifer had some issues the family was not aware of. The family would appreciate some time and space to assist Jennifer in dealing with these issues." Oh, now isn't that just special. Jennifer has issues. She has half the freakin' nation looking for her, spending taxpayer resources by the bucket full ... and she has issues. Now that the cops aren't stomping through briars and creek beds looking for her body, the family wants some time to assist Jennifer in dealing with her "issues." How nice. And just who is going to help the taxpayers deal with their issues? Issues like all the money that was spent because of her little stunt. Hey .. Jennifer! Here's an issue for you to deal with. What's going to happen the next time a woman IS actually abducted on her evening run? Will the law enforcement effort be just a bit less intense because of your childish little stunt? Will some woman actually suffer while police are pondering whether or not this could be yet another runaway bride? Many people thought that John Mason just might be guilty of murder because of the recent Scott Peterson case. How many women truly in danger will be disbelieved because of Jennifer Wilbanks? And just when is her appearance on Oprah? Oh .. you just know this is coming, don't you? Book deals .. perhaps a movie ... and then the crowning glory, Jennifer on Oprah! Maybe the book deal would be a good idea. Jennifer can pledge 100% of her royalties to pay back the people of Duluth for the money she cost them and the damage she did to Duluth's peaceful reputation. That ought to just about take care of it. Then you can just move. If Jennifer does sign a movie or book deal and doesn't pledge the revenues to those she damaged, then let's all follow the advice that a Duluth hairdresser named Lorraine gave to the entire nation on her weekend appearance on CNN. "Don't friggen' watch it." I think I like Lorraine. Oh, by the way. Has a new date for the wedding been set? Run John!
You do remember the case of that out-of-control five-year-old in St. Petersburg, Florida, don't you? The police finally had to handcuff her in order to keep her from hurting someone else or herself. Well, the inevitable has happened. The little girl was black. At least some of the police who showed up subdue her were white. That just can't be allowed to go unanswered. So, here comes the NAACP to the rescue. The NAACP wants the police disciplined. I'm sure nobody is surprised. Business as usual for the NAACP .. playing the race card to get attention. OK .. now just how does the story of an abandoned U-Haul become important enough to make it to the Nuze? Go back ten years ago to Oklahoma City on April 19, 1995. , that's how. It was a U-Haul truck full of explosives that destroyed the Murrah Federal Building and killed 168 people. A U-Haul used as a truck bomb. It happened once, but somehow authorities in our country act like it could never happen again. Since 1995 I'm not aware of any city in the United States that put any restrictions on rental trucks. Today you can drive a rental truck down virtually any street in the middle of New York City or Washington DC. Any one of those trucks could be filled with enough explosives to kill thousands. All you have to do is set it off at the right place at the right time. Restrictions? I know of none. But then what about small planes? Oh yes, you can still drive a rental truck through downtown Chicago .. but Chicago's pathetic Mayor wants all small airplanes banned from flying over the city. Why? Terrorism fears. A small airplane has never been used in a terrorist attack. Trucks have. Ban trucks? No. Ban small airplanes? Let's do it. The question, then, is just how in the hell that rental truck got to the curb at Hartsfield anyway. How long did it sit there with the driver gone? How many people would have been killed if it had been full of explosives? What safeguards were in place to have prevented a truck loaded with explosives to get that close to the airport terminal? Meanwhile .. inside .. TSA agents were busy making people remove their shoes.
It is in the interest of the safety and security
of the United States and its citizens that Iran's nuclear capabilities be
destroyed. Now, not later. The peace-at-any-price crowd in this
country has made that task politically difficult, if not impossible.
Who is going to be the first prison guard to get a shot at that randy little Lynndie England when she gets sent off to a military prison? Do you think they'll draw straws, or will it be some sort of a lottery?
I would like to thank Sean Hannity for the extra-clean studios I get to broadcast from this morning at our flagship station, News Talk 750 WSB in Atlanta. Sean, you see, will be doing his show from these very same studios this afternoon. His presence has created quite a stir in these parts ... and the cleaning crew was in the studio over the weekend with a vengeance. We need to get him down here more often. I can't even find traces of Clark Howard's peanut butter on the computer keyboards.
READING ASSIGNMENTS The "Foxization" of American News. It's a good thing, actually. The U.S. soldiers that shot at the car carrying Communist journalist Giuliana Sgrena have been officially exonerated. Also,
satellite images show that the car was going 60 miles an hour, not 30 miles an hour as the Italians want to believe. George Bush is calling the Democrat's bluff on Social Security. The collapse of the big media. Poor liberals, they just can't seem to keep their grip on the information infrastructure in the United States. Another critical look at what passes for border control along our Arizona border with Mexico. Morning Sickness: If you think your...equipment...is worth sharing with more ladies than you have time for, maybe it could be immortalized in sex toy form. | |||
WHAT THE HECK ARE THOSE POINTY HAND THINGS? BOORTZ BLAST NEWSLETTER
NEAL'S FANS GET TOGETHER
Belinda Skelton, Ken Rogers, Laura Nunemaker and Brian Ganey assist in the daily preparation of Nealz Nuze! |
© 2013 Cox Media Group. By using this website,
you accept the terms of our Visitor Agreement and Privacy Policy, and understand your options regarding Ad Choices
.
Already have an account? Sign In
{* #registrationForm *} {* traditionalRegistration_displayName *} {* traditionalRegistration_emailAddress *} {* traditionalRegistration_password *} {* traditionalRegistration_passwordConfirm *}Already have an account? Sign In
{* #registrationFormBlank *} {* registration_firstName *} {* registration_lastName *} {* traditionalRegistration_displayName *} {* traditionalRegistration_emailAddressBlank *} {* registration_birthday *} {* registration_gender *} {* registration_postalZip *} {* traditionalRegistration_passwordBlank *} {* traditionalRegistration_passwordConfirmBlank *} {* agreeToTerms *}We have sent you a confirmation email. Please check your email and click on the link to activate your account.
We look forward to seeing you frequently. Visit us and sign in to update your profile, receive the latest news and keep up to date with mobile alerts.
Don't worry, it happens. We'll send you a link to create a new password.
{* #forgotPasswordForm *} {* forgotPassword_emailAddress *}We have sent you an email with a link to change your password.
We've sent an email with instructions to create a new password. Your existing password has not been changed.
To sign in you must verify your email address. Fill out the form below and we'll send you an email to verify.
{* #resendVerificationForm *} {* resendVerification_emailAddress *}Check your email for a link to verify your email address.


You're Almost Done!
Select a display name and password
{* #socialRegistrationForm *} {* socialRegistration_displayName *} {* socialRegistration_emailAddress *} {* traditionalRegistration_password *} {* traditionalRegistration_passwordConfirm *}Tell us about yourself
{* registration_firstName *} {* registration_lastName *} {* registration_postalZip *} {* registration_birthday *} {* registration_gender *} {* agreeToTerms *}