The world-famous Internet site of the Nationally Syndicated Neal Boortz Show!
Hi, (not you?) | Member Center | Sign Out
Posted: 1:00 a.m. Monday, May 23, 2005
By Neal Boortz
| Today's Nuze: May 23, 2005 | ||
![]() | ||
| Monday -- May 23, 2005
The Democrats were looking for a term. Some term with some universal appeal that they could tie to the filibuster controversy. Well, everybody's for minority rights, right? Everyone wants to make sure that minority rights aren't violated, right? Well, since it's a senate minority that's holding up the confirmation votes for these nominees, why not just say that this is all about minority rights? That will resonate so well with the American people. "Oh, look at those stalwart Democrats dear! All this time we thought they were just trying to prevent any conservatives who actually believe our Constitution is the supreme law of the land from getting onto the appeals benches. We were so wrong! We should be so ashamed! All this time it's really been all about minority rights!" There is absolutely nothing in the Constitution .. nowhere .. that confers any privilege whatsoever on a Senate minority when it comes to the process of offering advice and consent on the nomination and confirmation of federal judges. Since there is no right conferred on any Senate minority in this process, there are no "minority rights" as Warlord Lowery calls them. Let's look a bit to the future. What happens if the loony, obstructionist left manages to establish the principal that a Senate minority has some sort of "right" to enforce during the judicial nomination process? What's next? Let's just go for the obvious from the get-go. Choose either the 2000 or the 2004 election. In both elections the vote of the electoral college was close. In 2000 the vote in Florida was close .. measured in the hundreds. If minority rights are violated when the majority of the Senate casts a vote one way or the other, then are not the same minority rights violated when the majority of the electoral college votes? Are not minority rights violated when the majority of voters in a state go for one candidate or the other? Are minority rights violated when the majority of voters in a city or county vote to elect a mayor, councilman or commissioner? This whole "minority rights" argument is insipidly stupid, even for Joseph Lowery -- who has never been challenged when it comes to making asinine statements. It's stupid, but it works. Democrats know that across the country people will nod their heads and say "Yeah ... my rights are being violated." And why? Well ... here we go again, but the blame goes to our system of government schools. You have to be pretty stupid to buy this "minority rights" argument ... but our country is suffering from no shortage of the "pretty stupid." Our government schools are too busy instilling false self-esteem to actually spend any time teaching the workings of our Constitution and how government is actually supposed to work. I guess I should lighten up on the schools though. If you can question the usefulness of teaching dead languages like Latin in the schools, why not question teaching the workings an all-but-dead Constitution?
Howard Dean is giving Democrats heartburn. That's a good thing. His performance on Meet the Press yesterday was less than impressive. He did make some good points; his response to the question about his church-going habits, for instance. But this one statement was, I thought, rather curious. Dean was asked if the Democrats were going to use the Schiavo matter against Republicans in the next election. He said "The Schiavo case will probably be the turning point about our ability to make our case to Americans about the incredible invasiveness of Republicans when it comes to making personal, private decisions," Oh really? Republicans are the ones who are invasive about personal and private decisions? Does he mean decisions like how your own money is going to be spent educating your child? Or how you are going to invest your own money for your retirement? Those kind of decisions? How about the decision on whether or not you want to join a union in a non right-to-work state? That's a personal decision, isn't it? Here's a personal decision: Choosing your doctor! Now, let me see. Was it the Democrats or the Republicans who wanted to put a health care system in place where the government chose your doctor, and chose the medical procedures your doctor would and would not be allowed to perform on you. And was it the Republicans or the Democrats who threatened us with jail if we actually made a personal and private decision to chose some other doctor. Yeah ... those Democrats are really champs when it comes to defending our freedom to make personal decisions, aren't they?
Well, that's Medicaid money. We're also spending Medicare money on Viagra so that senior citizens can get erections. The initial cost estimates on the Viagra for senior sex initiative run to about $500 million a year. We know how initial estimates go. The true tab will probably be in the billion-dollar-a-year category in no time at all. I know of no clause in the Constitution which guarantees an active sex life to any citizen. Therefore, there is no legitimate reason to compel taxpayers to pay for erections for either rapists or senior citizens. Can't make it any plainer than that.
Friday I put a picture of the cover of Clark Howard's next book, Clark's Big Book of Porn!, here on Nealz Nuze. Several staffers -- like String and The Pig Farmer, pleaded with me to take the book cover off the web page. They were oh so afraid that Clark was going to be (gasp!) offended! Sooooo ... around noon I took down the image. Then, wouldn't you know it, I get a call from Clark at about two hours later asking me to put it back up! Well ... keep watching. Sometime this week .. the return of Clark's Big Book of Porn!
Here's more evidence that rednecks are particularly good at multi-tasking. View the rest of the Redneck Scrap Book. We've received some redneck scrap book submissions from listeners, so look for those to start showing up soon. YOUR READING ASSIGNMENTS You won't read it anywhere else, so here is the past two week's worth of good news from Iraq. It's time to reign in the International Red Cross. This organization, not to be confused with the American Red Cross, does not particularly like the United States. When an election is iffy in Germany, pull out the anti-Americanism. This time it didn't work. Democratic
Party Chairman Howard Dean went on Meet The Press yesterday, and moderator
Tim Russert let him have it. It's about time.
Oh, and here's a transcript, in
case you missed it. Medicaid paying for Viagra for convicted sex offenders and rapists. Morning Sickness: Britney Spears pukes by pool. | ||
WHAT THE HECK ARE THOSE POINTY HAND THINGS? BOORTZ BLAST NEWSLETTER
NEAL'S FANS GET TOGETHER
Belinda Skelton, Ken Rogers, Laura Nunemaker and Brian Ganey assist in the daily preparation of Nealz Nuze! |
© 2013 Cox Media Group. By using this website,
you accept the terms of our Visitor Agreement and Privacy Policy, and understand your options regarding Ad Choices
.
Already have an account? Sign In
{* #registrationForm *} {* traditionalRegistration_displayName *} {* traditionalRegistration_emailAddress *} {* traditionalRegistration_password *} {* traditionalRegistration_passwordConfirm *}Already have an account? Sign In
{* #registrationFormBlank *} {* registration_firstName *} {* registration_lastName *} {* traditionalRegistration_displayName *} {* traditionalRegistration_emailAddressBlank *} {* registration_birthday *} {* registration_gender *} {* registration_postalZip *} {* traditionalRegistration_passwordBlank *} {* traditionalRegistration_passwordConfirmBlank *} {* agreeToTerms *}We have sent you a confirmation email. Please check your email and click on the link to activate your account.
We look forward to seeing you frequently. Visit us and sign in to update your profile, receive the latest news and keep up to date with mobile alerts.
Don't worry, it happens. We'll send you a link to create a new password.
{* #forgotPasswordForm *} {* forgotPassword_emailAddress *}We have sent you an email with a link to change your password.
We've sent an email with instructions to create a new password. Your existing password has not been changed.
To sign in you must verify your email address. Fill out the form below and we'll send you an email to verify.
{* #resendVerificationForm *} {* resendVerification_emailAddress *}Check your email for a link to verify your email address.


You're Almost Done!
Select a display name and password
{* #socialRegistrationForm *} {* socialRegistration_displayName *} {* socialRegistration_emailAddress *} {* traditionalRegistration_password *} {* traditionalRegistration_passwordConfirm *}Tell us about yourself
{* registration_firstName *} {* registration_lastName *} {* registration_postalZip *} {* registration_birthday *} {* registration_gender *} {* agreeToTerms *}