OK ... CAN WE START THE PROFILING NOW?

The Brits have identified 19 of the Islamic terrorists who had been plotting to blow up as many as ten airliners over the Atlantic ocean.  Let's see now:  What do we have here!  Why ... and I hope you're sitting down here, because this is certainly very shocking --- every one of the 19 people who have been arrested thus far were men.  They were all younger men, anywhere from 17 to 35 years old.  Oh ...  and every one of them had a Muslim name. 

Many of these terrorists were British born.  British citizens. Most of these are believed to be children of Pakistani immigrants.  So, there's that European problem with Muslim immigration raising its ugly head again.  Reports are that two of these bums were converts to Islam.

What else stands out here?  Well, there were no 78-year-old blue-haired grannies on the list. There were no families traveling with children.  There were no young mothers with children in tow. 

There are many absurdities in the way we are trying to keep Islamic terrorists (remember, "terrorists" is only half a word) off airplanes.  I remember one particular DEA agent who was allowed to board a commercial flight in the U.S. with his gun ... but not before the security official confiscated his nail clippers.

Our enemies here are intelligent and cunning.  When we refuse to profile at airport security points we look stupid and vulnerable.

911 Hijackers

USING THE PROPER LABEL FOR TERRORISTS

Yesterday President George W. Bush caused quite a stir when he made a statement to the media on the airport tarmac.  His exact words were:  "This nation is at war with Islamic fascists who will use any means to destroy those of us who love freedom, to hurt our nation."  That's right....he said it.  Islamic fascists.  It's about time somebody the president start using the proper label.

This didn't set too well with CAIR, the Council for American Islamic Relations.  Perhaps a better name for that organization would be the Council for Anti-American Islamic Retaliation.  But anyway, I digress.  Back to CAIR's comments.  Their executive director took issue with the Islamic fascism label, saying "We believe this is an ill-advised term and we believe that it is counter-productive to associate Islam or Muslims with fascism," 

Ill-advised?  How can a term that is so fundamentally correct be "ill-advised?" 

A quick check of Dictionary.com finds this definition of fascism:  "A system of government marked by centralization of authority under a dictator, stringent socioeconomic controls, suppression of the opposition through terror and censorship, and typically a policy of belligerent nationalism and racism."  Sound familiar?  Let's see....Iran...Syria....Iraq under Saddam Hussein...The Taliban....and on and on.  Fascism is what these terrorists who were trying to blow up the planes yesterday ultimately want for every country.  Total Islamic domination, in other words, a theocracy.

CAIR went on, speaking about the president:  "We urge him and we urge other public officials to restrain themselves."  Restrain themselves?  Why should they?  We're being attacked!  Islamic fascists have declared war on Western culture in general, and the United States in particular.  Our leaders are showing too much restraint, not too little.

Since when does speaking the truth require restraint?  Just about every terrorist attack in the last 30 years has been committed in the name of Islam.  That's their public relations problem, not ours.

By the way, no mention in the news coverage of CAIR's remarks of a condemnation of terrorism.  Imagine my surprise.

Farkers are photoshopping their own news photos with the expected hilarious results.

DEMOCRATS CAN'T HELP THEMSELVES

I suppose the appeasement party thinks that these attacks would not have happened if Saddam Hussein had still been in power.

REMEMBER THIS GUY?

Who can forget British Member of Parliament George Galloway.  Once tossed out of office by British voters, he was re-elected awhile ago in a majority Muslim district.  (Shades of Cynthia McKinney!)  This seems appropriate, because he has since become the darling of Islamic dictators the world over.  He was even on Saddam Hussein's illegal oil-for-food racket payroll.  He's done quite well for himself with blood money.

Well, anyway, all of this leads us to the events of yesterday.  According to the sister of Islamic terror suspect Waheed Zaman, one of the alleged plotters from yesterday, George Galloway knew him very well.  In fact, she says her brother knew Galloway quite well and met him "many times."  Now, to be fair, this bit of news comes from a British tabloid...The Sun.  I'm sure they make mistakes from time to time.  But in this case, the shoe fits so well, one can hardly not believe it.

You have to wonder when British voters are going to hit their limit with this terrorist appeaser, masquerading as a Member of Parliament.  What's next...a revelation that he had tea with Mohammed Atta on the morning of 9/11?

REDNECK SCRAP BOOK

We're starting to assemble quitetheassortmentofredneckmailboxes. Here's the latest. More in the Redneck Scrap Book.

BOORTZ BLAST NEWSLETTER
Everyone is talking about the Boortz Blast newsletter. Do you want yours? Sign up here and we'll deliver it directly to your inbox every 2 weeks. If you signed up but aren't receiving it, either your company or your spam filter could be keeping it from you. Try using a personal email address and check your spam filter's junk folder for wayward newsletters.

COMMUNITY
If you like Neal and are looking for like minded people to hang out with online or off, check out these places:

Talkmaster Yahoo Group

Belinda Skelton, Ken Rogers, Laura Nunemaker and Brian Ganey assist in the daily preparation of Nealz Nuze!