Monday -- March 13, 2006
THE PRESIDENT'S RENOVATION STRATEGY
Renovation strategy? That's one word you could use.
Today
George Bush begins a series of speeches trying to turn more public support
for the war on terror in general and the war in Iraq in particular. It's
an effort to rebuild his approval numbers. We've seen this before.
The public becomes restless, and George Bush launches a series of speeches about
the war in Iraq. Today Bush will talk about the global war on terror at
George Washington University.
I'm still a supporter of the Iraqi war. I still
believe that Saddam Hussein had to be removed from power. U.N Resolutions
687, 786 and 1441 clearly set forth the legal basis for the removal of Saddam
Hussein, and no other country seemed willing to bear the responsibility. I
firmly believe that had the United States backed off, Hussein would have seen it
as a sign of weakness, and he would have quickly resurrected his weapons
programs. In the long term, the United States would have suffered.
In spite of the bleatings of the left and the failure of our mainstream media to
report the facts objectively, there most definitely was a connection between
Saddam Hussein and Al Qaeda, and that connection might well have blossomed into
a full-scale collaboration had we not interceded. I know that there
are many who disagree, but I don't feel that there are many out there who have
put any real research into the matter who would express a differing viewpoint.
[Just read "The Connection, How al Qaeda's Collaboration with Saddam Hussein
has Endangered America" by Stephen F. Hayes. published by Harper Collins] OK ... here's the "but." Right now if some pollster
asked me whether I approve or disapprove of the way George Bush is handling his
second term in office, my only honest answer would be in the negative. At
this point there are other things that I would like to see George Bush address;
other things I would like for him to explain. A sampling: - Why did he sign the
McCain-Feingold campaign finance
reform act? He clearly stated that he thought the law was
unconstitutional, but he signed it anyway. Now our right to political
free speech is clearly under assault.
- Why has non-defense related government spending risen
so fast during his Administration? Why did he set all-time records for
government spending increases during the first three years of his presidency?
- Why has he been silent on the issue of school choice?
- Why did he team up with Ted Kennedy to double spending
on the Department of Education, a Department Republicans had pledged to
eliminate six years before he was elected. The spending hasn't helped.
The quality of education has steadily decreased during the past six years.
- Forget the Arab aspects of the port deal, why would
George Bush support turning over essential operations of six American ports to
any foreign government, let alone an Arab one?
- Why hasn't he spoken out forcefully against the
Kelo v.
New London decision from the Supreme Court and the wholesale assault on the
concept of private property rights that is ongoing in this country today?
- How could it possibly be that he hasn't found one
single bill worthy of a presidential veto during the past five years? Is
this an indication that over the past five years the Congress of the United
States hasn't passed one single solitary piece of legislation that George Bush
considered to be contrary to the principles of our Constitution, or excessive
in any way?
- How in the wide, wide world of sports did he get talked
into this obscene
prescription drug program for wizened citizens? Didn't
he realize that the average senior citizen spends about $600 a year on
prescription drugs? That amounts to $1.64 a day. Every major
pharmaceutical company out there has "lifeline" programs that insure that no
American would go without a needed prescription drug. Yet he creates one
of the biggest spending programs in our history; one that is destined to
exceed all cost estimates. Why?
- What's the deal with tax reform? The president
appoints a fancy panel to study our tax system, proposals for reform, and come
up with a plan for a complete overhaul. What does the panel come up
with? A virtual repeat of the 1986 tax reform act. Eliminate
deductions and establish a few flat rates. The 1986 law has been amended
over 9000 times since 1986. Now that's reform. The American
people want some real reform. Where is the president?
- Why hasn't he spoken out more forcefully for real
reform in medical care? Why hasn't he spoken out for more competition?
How about a demand that congress give every private individual in this country
the same tax breaks that businesses get when they buy health insurance
policies?
- Why has he absolutely failed to do anything at all
about the invasion of illegal immigrants flooding into our country across our
border with Mexico? Why hasn't he called for a full federal
investigation of charges that armed and uniformed Mexicans are firing on
Border Patrol agents? Why hasn't he called for stricter penalties
against employers who enable this flood of illegal immigration?
- Why hasn't he told Hillary Clinton to sit down and shut
the hell up until she comes up with a reasonable explanation for those billing
records?
- Why hasn't he told FEMA to set aside their asinine
regulations and get every vehicle with a trailer hitch in Arkansas to hook up
to one of those trailers and yank the damned things down to New Orleans to
provide housing for police, firefighters and any American citizen who
wants to work to rebuild that city?
- After the Cheney hunting incident, why didn't he go to
the White House press room and say "OK, so you didn't get the story first.
So it was broken by a small newspaper in Corpus Christi. You got
scooped. Deal with it. Suck it up. You aren't the only studs
with press cards. The American people are rather enjoying seeing you so
put out over this. Why don't you run over to Capitol Hill and ask Ted
Kennedy why he went to sleep while Mary Jo's body was still in the back seat
of his car? Henry Whittington is alive. Mary Jo is still dead."
Couldn't you just see his approval ratings soar after a presidential slap-down
like that?
- Why hasn't he spoken out against the leftist inspired
war against the individual? Ted Kennedy (there's that name again) spoke
in favor of it? Who is championing for the individual out there?
OK --- that's just a start. Suffice it to say that
George Bush needs to talk about much more than the global war on terror to float
my boat. FIRST IMPEACHMENT SHOT FIRED
The last 15 months or so
have been an absolute disaster for the Democratic party. Despite all of their
howling and jumping up and down, they have yet to:
- Capitalize on an
increasingly unpopular war. Why? They don't have any better ideas.
- Do anything about the
NSA wiretapping without warrants. Just not much outrage in the heartland over
eavesdropping on potential Islamic terrorists.
- Make any political hay
over the slow Katrina response. People have moved on.
- Get any mileage out of
the blown Dubai Ports deal. The company pulled out and the Democrats are back to
square one.
- Dick Cheney's hunting
incident. It made for good comedy, but no points scored for the Democrats.
Add on top of all that,
George W. Bush nominated and got confirmed to the bench two conservative Supreme
Court justices and the Democrats couldn't stop that . The left is literally so
incompetent, the can get to the red zone, but can't seem to really score. They
just have no ideas of what to do differently. They also have no unified,
coherent message. So what's the next political move down at DNC headquarters?
Well, we found out
yesterday on ABC's This Week with George Stephanopoulos. Wisconsin Senator Russ
Feingold has decided that
it's time to get either the impeachment or
the censure ball rolling. You knew this was coming, by the way. Feingold has
his boxers in a knot over the NSA wiretapping without a warrant. In an attempt
to revise history, he said Bush's actions were "much more serious, clearly, than
anything Bill Clinton ever did." Uh-huh. Remember, to the Democrats, lying to
a grand jury is okay.......unless you're Scooter Libby. Then it's a problem.
Feingold, by the way, is rumored to be eyeing the Democratic presidential
nomination. Hmmmmm.
At the end of the day,
this will go nowhere. But that won't stop the Democrats from trying. And if
they're able to take back the House or the Senate this fall and the subpoena
power that goes with it, the White House had better look out.
SADDAM'S WMD PLANS
One thing the White House
has done an exceptionally poor job of doing is rebutting the claim by the left
that Saddam Hussein had no weapons of mass destruction. Not only did he have
the weapons, he used them. But we're starting to get more information that
proves Saddam was pursuing WMD.
It would seem Saddam and
his cronies liked to
make audiotapes of their meetings. Those tapes have been
acquired by the U.S. government. According to media reports, the tapes show
that Saddam was ready to fire up his WMD program the minute the inspectors went
away. The tapes speak of WMD factories being ready. There's also quite a few
documents that are being analyzed.
Those documents talk about
burying missiles. That would explain where they all went. Lots of desert in
Iraq...they could be anywhere. And you know what else we're learning? It would
seem Saddam was trying in the mid-90's to buy uranium from Africa. But
wait...Saddam never tried to buy uranium in Africa...the left says so!
Imagine what it would be
like...if tomorrow Saddam's entire stockpiles of weapons of mass destruction
were found buried in the desert. What would the Democrats say then? That day
just may come.
THE 2008 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION
The 2008 presidential
election may be 2 1/2 years away, but things are already underway. There is
news today of
Senate Majority Leader Bill First winning a straw poll in
Tennessee. (Gosh...his home state...imagine that!) Maybe if he runs, he could
carry his home state, unlike Gore in 2000. (John McCain, by the
way, really stepped in it preparing for this straw poll. More on that in
the show today.)
So what does this straw
poll mean?
Absolutely nothing. The odds of whoever is considered the front-runner this far
out actually being the nominee are slim and none. The media headlines always
talk about the Senators that are supposedly running (Frist, McCain, Hillary
Clinton, etc.) But perhaps it's time to crack the history book and see where
presidents come from in the modern era.
The last sitting senator
to be elected president of the United States was John F. Kennedy. Americans do
not elect their presidents from Congress. Of the last 10 presidents, there have
been 4 governors, 4 vice presidents, 1 senator and one general. 4 of the last 6
presidents have been governors. So the statehouse is where you're more likely
to find our next chief executive.
Maybe in 2008 it will be
the mayor's office with Giuliani. Or perhaps Mitt Romney will get the nod. But
Washington politicians are probably going to be in for a lot of disappointment,
if history is any guide. YAWN ... HERE COMES THE "RACIST" CHARGE IN THE PORTS
FLAP
Here we go. Some in Dubai are suggesting that
the whole
ports deal flap was due to racism .... it's all because the citizens of the
United Arab Emirates are Arabs! Wow! Who woulda thunk it?
These whiners would have us believe that the fact that Dubai had some rather
close connections to those who attacked our country on 9/11 had nothing to do
with our opposition to the ports deal; that our opposition was all based on
race. Look for the media to play this one up a bit. It's hard for
the media to ignore a good "racism" story, even when the definitions don't fit. HOW ABOUT SOME GOOD AND BAD EMAIL?
The bad first ... we'll leave the spelling where we found
it: Message: Neal, I was real upset to hear you slay Harley Davidson. Harley had loud
pipes long befor the SISSY bikes come along. It was"nt till I heard you
say what kind of bike you bought, that I understood your feelings. I know
now that your not man enough to ride a real motorcycle. I can only hope
that I'm next to you at a red light so I can REALEY PISS YOUR WHIMPY ASS
OFF. Thanks from a faithfull listner, Walter |
And now for the good! .... Dear Mr. Boortz. Thank you for being what appears to be a lone, sane voice against this
abomination called eminent domain. I have been surfing the web in the vain
hope of finding anyone and any place which has had the stones to fight
this epidemic and can find no one who seems to be willing to take a stand.
Last week I heard a guest on your show allude to the possibility of
someone, left with nothing to loose, who might barracade themselves in
their home and possibly shoot it out with the oppresive money hungry
municipality. Unfortunatly this may be what it will take. Wasn't it said
that once a government no longer represents the best interrests of it's
people that it is the right and duty of the people to change it? As I see
it, the government is not the real problem but rather the people's
inability to take action against an oppressive situation, to speak out en
mass against this situation. I think this eminent domain abuse is here
simply because the municipalities have gotten away with it. If we the
people had the balls to stand up for our rights, this would never have
happened. If we Americans don't start to wake up and stand up for our
rights, we are going to lose them all in the very near future. Eminent
Domain and the open border between here and Mexaco are a wake up call. We
can either wake up and take action or stay a bunch of idiots with our
thumbs up our butts and our heads in the sand and watch government and
our own stupidity bury us alive. Like you I also agree that teacher's
unions and our pathetic excuse for a government sanctioned education
system are partly to blame as well. Mr. Boortz, although there are a few
points we differ on, I do enjoy your show and agree with most everything
you have to say. Your show is an oasis of intelligent, coherent thought
in a sea of stupidity. You are right. Somebody's got to say it! My hat's
off to you sir! William Bittle |
REDNECK SCRAP BOOK
Who says rednecks don't have class? They sure know how to
travelinstyle. More in the Redneck Scrap Book.
READING ASSIGNMENTS
Slobodan Milosevic is
dead...and along with many other people,
Martin Bell says good riddance.
By the way, who cares if he was poisoned? If he was, that was one slick
operation. Maybe we could hire the same guy to off Saddam.
What are the odds that
Democrats will take back control of the House of Representatives this fall?
Michael Barone, who was the first to call the Republican takeover in 1994, takes
a look at the odds.
What are the odds that
Rudy Giuliani will be the Republican nominee in 2008?
Peter Brown goes inside the poll numbers...and says Giuliani may be too much of
a social liberal to win the nomination.
With a recent poll showing
a majority of people having a negative view of Islam,
Mark Steyn says the media is still doing its best to shelter Islamic terrorists.
He also takes on the notion that the American people are intolerant.
Professor Mike Adams has been getting some hate mail
from conservatives that don't like it when he espouses his religious views in
his column. Today he responds the the criticism.
Is there such a thing as a
thrifty Republican these days? With federal spending at record levels and the
House and Senate spending like never before,
Robert Novak says that's not likely to change.
The left loves to talk
about how women vote for Democrats.
Jeff Jacoby points out that of the last 7 presidential elections, Republicans
have won 3 times with more women's votes
than the Democrats. There goes that theory.
It seems like everybody is
getting into the 2008 election game.
Now former Senate Minority Leader Tom Daschle says he might run.
Something about the GOP scaring people. Sounds like a successful platform to
me.
Dubai Ports World may be
pricing their deal to take over their ports so high that no American buyer could
be found.
Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist says in that case, DPW might be allowed to run
the ports after all.
Huh?
What exactly is the point
of Al Gore going around the country criticizing George Bush? Isn't he out of
politics?
Perhaps he has his sights set on 2008.
That would be something, wouldn't it. Al vs. Hillary.
18 die in Daytona Bike Week related accidents, more than double the
fatalities from last year. |