Monday -- May 15, 2006
BUSH SPEAKS TONIGHT
President Bush will make his address to the
nation tonight on the issue of what the politically correct among us refer
to as "illegal immigrants" or the "immigration" problem. The "immigrant"
word seems to have stuck. It's just a nicer way of saying "gate crasher."
The proper phrase is not "anti-immigrant" because these people aren't
immigrants. Immigration is a legal procedure, and those who ignore the
legalities and just flow across the border in violation of our laws don't
earn that label. If these home invaders are immigrants, than we could just
as easily apply the same name to an invading army. Call them what they are,
and please don't cloak them with the same respect do most of our ancestors
who followed the law and waited in line to get here.
By the way ... apparently talk show hosts like me are part of the
problem. Over the weekend I read the words of some columnists who made
references to "anti-immigrant talk radio." Secondly, instead of
"anti-immigrant," what's the matter with the phrase "pro-sovereignty?" We're really going to have to wait until after Bush's little speech
tonight before the real discussion starts, but there are a few points I
would sure like for him to cover. 1. We're supposed to have a military capacity in this country to fight
two separate wars in two separate areas of the globe at the same time. Now
we hear that we don't even have enough troops to put on the Mexican-American
border. If we can't stop the Mexicans from invading the U.S., we sure as
hell can't stop Kim Jong Il from invading South Korea. Sup wid dat? 2. Does your idea of a path to citizenship put these illegals who have
flooded our country ahead of those who have followed the rules and who have
gone to our embassies and consulates, filled out the proper paperwork, and
then have waited for their return phone call? If so, aren't we, the great
country of the rule-of-law, rewarding these people for ignoring those laws? 3. Are you willing to place harsh penalties on American employers who
hire illegals? We know that these employers of illegals are huge supporters
of the Republican Party. Can you put your oath of office to defend the
borders of this country ahead of those campaign contributions? 4. Do you have the courage to tell Vicente Fox that his open support and
encouragement of the Mexican invasion is not making him any friends in this
country, and that it will no longer be tolerated? 5. Are you willing to take a principled position and stand up to the
sure-to-come demands from the left that non-citizen Mexicans and Hispanics
be allowed to vote in local elections around the country?
Speaking of El Presidente .... Mexican president Vicente Fox called Bush
yesterday to
ask if he was militarizing the border. Well, duhhhhh. Pretty
nervy guy, that Vicente. Let's see ... the Mexican government is openly
encouraging the invasion of the United States by it's low-skilled workers.
The Mexican government even
prints instructions on how to cross the border,
and to avoid being caught once in the US. There are reports -- too
many to
ignore -- of uniformed Mexican troops appearing along the border to assist
Mexicans in getting across, even reports of illegals being ferried across
the border in Mexican army troop carriers. And, to top it off, there are
reports that uniformed Mexican troops have actually fired on U.S. Border
Patrol agents trying to intercept Mexican drug smugglers. In the face of
all this .... Vicente Fox calls Bush to ask if he's militarizing the
border?
Fox has a lot at stake here. Mexico is a country rich in natural
resources and people. There is no reason Mexico can't be a thriving
economic power unto itself -- no reason, that is, except for the rampant
corruption throughout the Mexican government. The illegals streaming across
the border into the U.S. give Fox relief on at least two fronts. One, they
relieve the pressure for reform that could lead to jobs and opportunities in
Mexico. Two, the illegal invaders represent about a $20 billion per year
boost to the Mexican economy. That's "free," if you will, money just
flowing into Mexico via wire transfers from the gate crashers living and
working in the U.S. Oh ... and by the way ... that's $20 billion that's not
being spent here to boost our economy. Bush will take the position tonight that there is just no practical way
that we can deport the 12 million illegal Mexican and Hispanic aliens now in
this country. Fine .. I agree. We can't deport them. Logistically, it
would be a nightmare and would most likely result in violence and riots in
many American cities. We can, though, yank out the welcome mat. I've gone
through this on the air and in the Nuze before, but just in case the
president's speech writers wanted to take a look at my notes before they
polished up Bush's remarks, (yeah ... right) ... here's just how to reverse
the flow: 1. Harsh .. to the draconian level .. penalties against any employer who
knowing hires any workers who are not in this country legally. 2. Punishment - though milder - of any employers who hire illegals
because they didn't conduct due diligence in the hiring process. 3. Change the law to deny citizenship to children born to a woman who is
in this country illegally. 4. No children of illegals in American government schools. 5. Deny all social welfare benefits to anyone who is in this country
illegally with the one exception of life-saving medical care. 6. Confiscate a substantial portion of the monies earned in this country
by illegal immigrants. We confiscate drug money because it was earned
illegally, so why can't we confiscate the money earned by illegals? I'm not
saying take it all. Leave them enough to buy some food and get a bus ticket
to Matamoras.
Does all this sound harsh? Sorry ... I suppose it is ... but these
people are criminals. They are NOT, as their signs proclaim, America. The
idea here is to make them feel as unwelcome here as we possibly can. Yank
out the welcome mat from under their feet. Make them prefer life in their
own country to a life of deprivation here. There's a letter making the Internet rounds. It was a letter to the
editor of a newspaper in North Carolina, but I've been unable to track it
down. Whoever wrote it ... it's brilliant. Here you go: | To the Editor:
Recently large demonstrations have taken place across the
country protesting the fact that Congress is finally addressing
the issue of illegal immigration. Certain people are angry that
the U.S. might protect its own borders, might make it harder to
sneak into this country and once here, to stay indefinitely. Let me see if I correctly understand the thinking behind
these protests. Let's say I break into your house. Let's say that when you
discover me in your home you insist that I leave. But, I say,
"I've made all the beds and washed the dishes and did the
laundry and swept the floors: I've done all the things you
don't like to do. I'm hard-working and honest ... except for
that part where I broke into your house. "According to the protestors, not only must you let me stay,
you must add me to your family's insurance plan and provide
other benefits for me and my family. My husband will do your
yard work because he too is hard-working and honest ... except
for that breaking in thing. "If you try to call the police or force me out I will call my
friends who will picket your house carrying signs that proclaim
my right to be here. It's only fair, after all, because you
have a nicer house than I do, and I'm just trying to better
myself. I'm hard-working and honest .... ummmmm .... except for
that breaking in thing. "Besides. What a deal it is for me! I live in your house,
contributing only a fraction of the cost of my keep, and there
is nothing you can do about it without being accused of
selfishness, prejudice and being anti-housebreaker! Did I miss anything? Does this sound reasonable to you? If
it does, grab a sign and go picket something. If this sounds
insane to you call your senators and enlighten them because they
are stumbling in the darkness right now and really need your
help. (Name? _______________) |
Well ... let's see what Bush has in store for us tonight. I'm virtually
certain he is going to make the case for the 12 million illegals in this
country staying. Add that to the past amnesties and we'll have about 30
million or so Mexicans and Hispanics in this country who came here illegally
and later had their behavior cleansed for the sake of politics. EAT THE RICH!
So .. you're upset that the capital gains and dividend tax cuts have been
extended? You agree with Democrats and various other anti-capitalist
leftists that this is nothing but a handout to the rich? Let's test that theory. Let's see just what the evil rich have been
getting away with since the taxes on their precious capital gains and
dividends were cut in 2003. Fact: The wealthiest 3% of Americans have seen their tax payments to
the Imperial Federal Government of the United States increase at twice
the rate of the other 97% of taxpayers from 2001 to 2004. Fact: Today, three years after the dividend and capital gains tax
cuts, the richest 3% of Americans are paying almost as much in total
income taxes to the federal government as the other 97% of taxpayers.
Those evil rich bastards are really getting away with murder, aren't
they? QUICK --- SOMEONE ALERT DALE CARDWELL!
Who's Dale Cardwell, you ask? Well ... since these program notes are
read virtually around the world, I'll explain. Cardwell is a television
"journalist" for our sister station, WSB-TV in Atlanta. Several weeks ago
Cardwell succumbed to the siren call of a local anti-airport group and did a
scare piece on all of the "unknown" airplanes that were flying in and out of
Atlanta's Dekalb-Peachtree airport and that the government didn't know where
these airplanes were going or who was in them! Oh, the humanity! Of course
Cardwell forgot to mention that his own television station's news helicopter
took off from that very same airport many times every day without filing a
flight plan .. which meant that the government didn't know where it was
going or who was in it!
Well ... hopefully just in time for sweeps ... we have a scoop for Dale
Cardwell! It happened just this past Saturday in Budapest! Someone was
flying a model radio-controlled airplane and it
crashed into a crowd and
killed two people! Oh my God! Do you mean people can be killed by a model
airplane? Well --- if a model airplane could kill two people just by
crashing into them, think what that model airplane could have done if it was
loaded with explosives! Or nerve gas! Now I happen to know that there are people right here in the city of
Atlanta who own and fly model airplanes, and the government doesn't know who
they are! What's more, the government doesn't know when and where they're
going to fly their model airplanes! This is a security nightmare! Why,
someone could park outside of Turner Field while a game was going on, launch
a model airplane from a parking lot, and fly it right into the stadium!
Imagine the carnage! Obviously these model airplane hobbyists need to be
identified and licensed, and the government needs to be notified every time
they fly one of those potentially lethal airborne bombs! It's happened in
Hungary, it could happen here! OK Dale! I've done your work for you! Now get on the story! Your first
call should be to your pal and great American watchdog Mickey Feltus! A
dedicated public servant like Mickey needs to know about this disaster just
waiting to happen! YOU GOTTA SEE THIS ....
Last week a London Court ruled on a court case involving Apple Computer
and the record label owned by the Beatles. How exciting. At any rate, BBC
called one Guy Kewney, the editor of Newswireless.net, to their studios to
be interviewed about the court case. When a production flunky ran to the
lobby to retrieve Mr. Kewney for the interview he managed to grab a clueless
cab driver instead. The poor cabbie, who could barely speak English, was
slammed onto the set and suddenly he was being interviewed about a case he
knew nothing about. You gotta give him credit. He was game .. in spite of
the look of absolute panic when he realized what was happening.
Here's the story. There's a link in the story where you can watch the
interview. Nobody knows who the cabbie is. They're looking for him, and if
they find him he'll be an instant Brit celebrity. Thanks to Drudge for
finding the story!
THIS SHOULD SCARE THE HELL OUT OF YOU
Someone named Dr. Robert O. Freedman, of the Baltimore Hebrew University
wrote an op-ed piece for The Baltimore Jewish Times in which he suggested
that what this world needs is an International Religious Court that would
ask governments to punish anyone who directs an insult at any religion or
religious figure. Freedman writes" All governments must agree that the
negative depiction of religion is out of bounds." What Freedman means, of
course, is that it should be a crime to make a negative comment about
religion. Nice, huh? A real champion of free speech, that Dr. Robert O. Freedman.
Sadly generations of government education have rendered a huge segment of
the American population a little to dull to understand just how dangerous
Freedman's words are. MAKE 'EM GO HOME AGAIN
Do you ever notice how many former congressman and Senators live in and
around Washington DC? When you fall in love with government you REALLY fall
in love with government. Here's an idea. What if we passed a law saying
that a member of congress must return to and live in his or her home
district for five years after leaving office! Hmmmmmmmm TIME TO START DRILLING
If ever there were a reason to start drilling in the Arctic National
Wildlife Refuge and to start more offshore drilling down in Florida...this
is it. You see, Venezuela is a nation where we get a lot of oil.
Unfortunately, that nation is currently fronted by an absolute lunatic...the
leftist dictator Hugo Chavez. Because of the control he has over the oil
market, Chavez is much more dangerous than say...Castro.
Our friend Chavez was in England over the weekend...meeting with the mayor
of London. You know the Lord Mayor Ken Livingstone, don't you? The Lord
Mayor is also buddies with the Islamic terrorists that run Iran. Chavez
announces that if the United States were to attack Iran,
oil would hit $100
a barrel. Said the Venezuelan crazy man: "If they attack Iran, the Iranians
will cut off their supply of oil. We would do the same if we were attacked.
We would cut off our oil. Moreover, Iran has said it would attack Israel,
and I know they have the wherewithal to do so." Sounds a bit like
Democratic talking points, doesn't it?
This is why we must begin drilling for as much of our own oil as possible.
Every day that goes by that we don't, we strengthen nutcases like Chavez and
terrorists like the ones that are in charge in Iran. Oh sure, we might not
trade directly with Iran...but all available oil goes into the world market,
contributing to the overall price. And just what has gotten us into this
jam in the first place?
Leftist, socialist, anti-capitalist environmental extremists, that's who.
The next time somebody comes out against drilling in ANWR, perhaps you
should ask them why they're supporting the economies of terrorist countries?
CLINTON MORE HONEST THAN BUSH?
A new poll shows just how effective the revisionist, anti-Bush media has
been in re-casting the Clinton years as a roaring success for this country.
According to CNN,
46% of people surveyed said Clinton was more honest than
George W. Bush. Only 41% answered correctly...saying Bush was more honest
than Clinton.
So why does Clinton have the edge? According to CNN's reporting, they say
it's WMD and the CIA leaks. Right. But what they fail to report is that
there is not a single shred of evidence that proves George W. Bush lied
about weapons of mass destruction in Iraq, nor is there any evidence that he
lied about any CIA leaks. In fact, President Bush and the entire Bush
administration have been exonerated in the leaking of Valerie Plame's name.
The next time some of your Democrat buddies accuse Bush of lying, ask for
the evidence. They won't have any, because there isn't any. By the way,
you do know that weapons of mass destruction were found in Iraq, don't you?
But Clinton..dishonesty was normal operating procedure for him. From lying
while under oath to telling his bimbos to "deny, deny, deny" to several
dishonest business dealings...there isn't enough room here to list
everything. But the media, always looking for the chance to spruce up
Bill's legacy...they cover it all up.
By the way .. this same poll also says that the majority of Americans
think that Clinton did a better job of solving their problems. If you think
that it is the government's responsibility to solve your problems, then it
is no wonder that the sheeple of this country would think that a Democrat
outperformed a Republican. REDNECK SCRAP BOOK Your cat might just be a
redneck if... More in the Redneck Scrap Book.
FAIRTAX RALLY -
WILL YOU BE THERE? Here's the deal folks. If we can get some sort of indication as to how many
people are really going to come to the
FairTax Rally May 24th, we may be able to upgrade to a larger venue. So, if
you are going to be there,
RSVP here. It's not for nuthin'. At the rally, 5 of these people and a guest will be
upgraded to the front row! Don't worry. You don't HAVE to RSVP. You're
welcome if you do and welcome if you don't. It'd just help us if you did.
READING ASSIGNMENTS
So what are Hillary Clinton's chances of winning the 2008 presidential
election? Former Speaker of the House
Newt Gingrich says she is beatable. Perhaps he will be the one running
against her.
According to Newsweek, George W. Bush's approval rating is up 6 points....to
35%. This proves yet again that the result you get in a poll depends on
who is doing the polling and who is being polled.
An immigration bill hits the floor of the Senate today. What would this
one do to curb the flow of illegal aliens? Nothing. In fact, this one
would double the amount of legal immigrants coming into this country. That
should do it...not.
And now a little history lesson...for those who want price controls and
windfall taxes on oil companies.
Patrice Hill says those ideas were tried in the 1970's...and led to several
shortages.
There have been a few left-wing Democrats that have called for George Bush's
impeachment.
So Mark Davis explores the idea: just what would they impeach him for?
Turns out there's not really a reason.
Congress doesn't just hand out pork-barrel spending in the form of money for
worthless bridges.
As Robert Novak reports, there's plenty of taxpayer-funded handouts to
corporations, too.
The NAACP opposes the idea of school choice vouchers...but why?
Star Parker points out that their position is designed to keep more black
people in poverty.
With every column, Professor Mike Adams takes on one institution of higher
learning or another...all in an effort to stamp out political correctness.
Today's target: Bucknell University. Always entertaining, never dull.
The biggest problem facing Republicans this fall as they try and retain
control of Congress is making sure the base turns out.
And as Jack Kelly explains, that base is hopping mad.
The United States' decision to send $10 million to Hamas...as the leaders of
the Palestinian Authority...is a mistake.
Diana West wants to know just when we're ever going to get tough with the
Palestinians. What if Al Gore was president?
Saturday Night Live takes a look.(video) |
You're Almost Done!
Select a display name and password
{* #socialRegistrationForm *} {* socialRegistration_displayName *} {* socialRegistration_emailAddress *} {* traditionalRegistration_password *} {* traditionalRegistration_passwordConfirm *}Tell us about yourself
{* registration_firstName *} {* registration_lastName *} {* registration_postalZip *} {* registration_birthday *} {* registration_gender *} {* agreeToTerms *}