There are arguably three groups of people who are really having a hard time wrapping their brains around what happened in Massachusetts. The first of those groups would be Democrats up for re-election. As Jamie Dupree put it, the results in Massachusetts turned a lot of Democrat knees to jelly. They know that if a Republican can win "Ted Kennedy's seat," there is no Democrat anywhere in the country that is safe in November.

The next group is the Obamabots. These are the people who are just so in love with Barack Obama that they cannot understand why anyone could possibly be upset with his performance thus far. These people also tend to believe that big government is the solution to many or most of our problems. They also believe that the Tea Party movement is fueled by nothing more than racist rednecks. Oh .. and they watch Entertainment Tonight.

The last group is the mainstream media ... or, if you will, the ObamaMedia. They handled the Brown win in different ways. Some (particularly newspapers) ignored it. Others tried to make excuses, trying to convince themselves that this Senate race wasn't really all that important. And others simply added their own (often critical) opinions of the race. Take a look at this graph, for example. Compare the coverage of CNN, MSNBC and FoxNews. You'll notice that CNN and MSNBC didn't bother to air all of Scott Brown's victory speech, cutting him off early. FoxNews on the other hand aired the entirety of both speeches. They are small details like this, the control of what people see, that contributes to the bias of the lamestream media. Oh .. and then there's that guy on MSNBC .. the one who used to be a pretty nice guy but has morphed into a world-class void surrounded by a sphincter muscle. He calls Scott Brown a psycho.

And so it goes.