Should UK rioters keep their benefits? 

The UK government is considering a plan to strip convicted rioters of their government benefits.  Prime Minister David Cameron says that there has been a “slow-motion moral collapse” in the UK. 

No kidding.  Take a look at this mom in the UK.  She has 10 children.  She doesn’t live with the baby daddy.  She lives on government benefits.  She’s a welfare broodmare.  Her 13 year old son was identified by police as one of the rioters.  He caused $32,000 worth of damage to one store alone with stolen equipment.  After appearing in court, the kid got off scot-free.  When asked who is to blame for her son’s looting, the mom replied, ''The government,'' adding: ''There is f*** all for them to do.''  She then goes on to say .. are you ready for it? .. he is a “good lad” who got “caught up in the violence.” 

As if that wasn’t outrageous enough, I’m reminded of this story we talked about from the UK back April.  Talk about a “slow-motion moral collapse” …

Most families who are due to lose their child benefit are worrying about how they'll make ends meet without it.

But for Kelly Marshall, who has five children by four different fathers, the handout has never been about paying for nappies, food and other everyday expenses.

She saved her benefit money to help pay for breast enhancement.

And as many parents envisage tightening their belts after the Tories announced plans to cut the benefit for higher-rate taxpayers, she plans to save more of hers for liposuction and a tummy tuck.

Miss Marshall, who has never worked, rakes in almost £29,000 a year from benefits - and last year spent £4,500 to go from a 34A to a 34DD.

 There are plenty more stories like this, folks.  Outrageous stories of moochers living off the productive taxpayers in society.  There is zero incentive for people to work if they know they can survive as a parasite.