Don’t be fooled by Princess Pelosi and her cherry-picked statistics.  She has been touting this statistic for quite some time, and she used again just yesterday: More jobs were created in the second year -- that would be last year -- in the private-sector in the Obama administration than in the eight years of the Bush administration.

Most Americans would hear that statistics, believe it and then go on their merry way, not thinking twice about it other than George Bush is bad and Obama is a jobs creator. 

But if you look at what Nancy Pelosi is saying, you will find that she is full of bat squeeze.  Somehow Pelosi failed to mention that during the first 7 years of the Bush presidency there were approximately 8 million private sector jobs ADDED … most AFTER the full Bush tax cuts went into existence.  And then, by citing only the second year of the Reign of Obama, she manages to avoid the 4 million job LOSSES in Obama’s first year.  Excuse me … but this is like me saying that I played better golf than Tiger Woods during that time Woods was convalescing from a seven iron to the jowls.

The fact is that Nancy Pelosi is comparing apples to oranges.  She picked the most successful year of the Obama administration, without giving you the whole picture.  She did not afford the Bush administration that same luxury.  If Princess Pelosi had used only the positive portion of George Bush’s statistics, as she did for Obama, it would have showed a gain of roughly 4 million private-sector jobs, which is a lot more than could be said for Obama.

Princess Pelosi also says that Republicans are “out to get the middle class.”  Good grief.