Here’s an actual headline from the Washington Post: “Kentucky, Arkansas primaries: Is it racism?”  What they are referring to are the primaries, which took place on Tuesday, where an unknown or undecided candidate racked up 40% of the vote against Obummer. Now if you read the Washington Post article, it actually goes on to explain that it is hard to tell exactly why people vote the way they do, but it does highlight one fact: Privately, Democrats believe that these primary results are because of racism. These voters went for “undecided” because they’re raaaaaaaacists!

The ObamaMedia is clearly willing to tote this line. Remember the recent New York Times article, “4 Years Later, Race Is Still Issue for Some Voters.” And take a look at the coverage of these embarrassing primaries in Kentucky and Arkansas. The ObamaMedia didn’t even feel the need to mention them in any of their morning shows -- ABC's Good Morning America, NBC's Today and CBS This Morning all skipped the embarrassing story.

You see .... when it comes to the DC and NYC press corps, 97% of these reporters, anchors and news writers and producers voted for Obama in 2008. Most of the will vote for him again. They simply cannot form an understanding in their minds as to why someone would NOT vote for Obama. After all, isn’t he really sort of a God? Didn’t he actually have to step DOWN into the role of the presidency? So in the minds of the media elite there can really only be one reason why you would not vote for Obama, and that’s ‘cause he’s a black dude.

I guess it’s time that we resurrect the Bradley Effect. Pollsters were worried about this phenomenon in 2008; it’s when white voters lie to pollsters about their intention to vote for a minority candidate. What’s the fancy name for media myrmidons who refuse to cover stories about a minority president?