Democrats must have pretty small minds because it seems as though they are only capable of latching onto the most mundane of details in these presidential debates. 

Denver debate: Big Bird.

New York debate: Binders.

Yes, binders.  The “binders full of women” comment has

certainly made the rounds.  Seriously?  We have the most important presidential election arguably in the history of this nation .. and the Democrats are all gunched up over Romney’s use of the word “Twitter?”   What if Romney had said that he had a binder full of Navy Seals.  Do you think they would be waving their flippers and screaming bloody murder?  Come on, folks.  Can we get serious here?

I would argue that most liberals could probably explain the “binders full of women” comment but have no idea the truth behind the “acts of terror” comment on Benghazi. 

Was it the best way to say what Romney was trying to say?  Of course not.  After 42 years talking on the radio, things don’t always come out of my mouth the way I intend them, or as some people think they should.  The difference, I suppose, is that I’m not running to be the leader of the free world.  Romney is. 

But answer me this … would you rather have a president who uses the clumsy line of “binders full of women” or would you rather have a president who tells Russia’s Medvedev that he’ll have more “flexibility” after the election?  Would you rather have a man who believes that Big Bird could be funded by the private sector, or a man who once called the private sector “the enemy”?  Would you rather have a man who wants to lift the 47% up by growing our economy and creating jobs, or the man who wants to keep successful Americans down because “at some point, you’ve made enough money”?

I could keep going.  But you get the point.